{"id":"W2048051247","doi":"10.1139/f08-092","title":"Evaluating probability sampling strategies for estimating redd counts: an example with Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Oncorhynchus; Chinook wind; Sampling (signal processing); Environmental science; Sampling design; Stratified sampling; Statistics; Sample size determination; Cluster sampling; Fishery; Abundance (ecology); Population; Hydrology (agriculture); Mathematics; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07640082,0.001725511,0.001157076,0.002189915,0.0005668589,0.001133248,0.001824836,0.001355493,0.0004952951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1423329,0.000725391,0.001590304,0.001941578,0.0008520421,0.002011808,0.001313029,0.0008841681,0.0001108591],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001861407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00180133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01031919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01170329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9410756,0.05018449,0.002159019,0.002359405,0.003890505,0.0003309775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7774355,0.1982518,0.007774762,0.005989678,0.01010691,0.0004413747],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002535852,0.00110584,0.1646602,0.001507921,0.002375015,0.0002517122,0.00188717,0.3697307,0.006206964,0.01353996,0.0007728187,0.4354259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005718689,0.004421276,0.03819913,0.0003106435,0.0006909321,0.0002419239,0.0005317224,0.937528,0.005687017,0.009603219,0.002059315,0.0001550534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2898656,0.001801129,0.7036504,0.0002421951,0.00003739083,0.002373693,0.0001874948,0.0002402213,0.001601822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3786256,0.000693293,0.618682,0.0001015626,0.0000187775,0.001499072,0.0001433064,0.00003192145,0.0002045264],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07640082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4040509,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1036571781571073,"score_gpt":0.2907400051187135,"score_spread":0.1870828269616062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}