{"id":"W2048065348","doi":"10.1890/08-1638.1","title":"Functional‐diversity indices can be driven by methodological choices and species richness","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Species richness; Alpha diversity; Beta diversity; Gamma diversity; Diversity (politics); Ecology; Trait; Functional diversity; Species diversity; Sensitivity (control systems); Biology; Dendrogram; Computer science; Sociology; Genetic diversity; Population; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002220674,0.00008228347,0.0001496148,0.00002360327,0.0005258748,0.000006953016,0.0001054347,0.0001078686,0.001870976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009803379,0.00007154724,0.00002055527,0.00007840007,0.0003969995,0.00008028497,0.0002694496,0.0001077476,0.00005029179],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005707576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003402196,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002621702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001710257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992954,0.0001326245,0.00009116366,0.0002321411,0.00007346897,0.0001751878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994776,0.0003498383,0.00006445467,0.00005680629,0.000005967133,0.00004533706],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001026785,0.00004784804,0.9913839,0.000001031485,0.00001503856,0.000004040869,0.0003117635,0.0001437676,0.0004312776,0.0008906286,0.006569979,0.0001905012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001932603,0.0001482004,0.9927079,3.452371e-7,0.00001498584,0.000005252318,0.00014141,0.00009214344,0.00004504108,0.003223915,0.003345631,0.0000818845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9833591,0.00004741001,0.0001579245,0.005785673,0.0001490303,0.0000771226,0.000008900844,0.00002909818,0.01038577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936066,0.00009232446,0.0008000701,0.002522716,0.00002127926,0.000005011446,0.00001145322,0.000001578352,0.002938992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0102475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990414,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04492568854350176,"score_gpt":0.2664289319996993,"score_spread":0.2215032434561975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}