{"id":"W2048085270","doi":"10.3109/13561820.2014.940038","title":"Enhancing patient-engaged teamwork in healthcare: an observational case study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","topic":"Interprofessional Education and Collaboration","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"CARE Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"Health Canada; HealthForceOntario; Canadian Patient Safety Institute; Canadian Health Services Research Foundation","keywords":"Teamwork; Observational study; Grounded theory; Psychological intervention; Competence (human resources); Health care; Nursing; Psychology; Focus group; Medical education; Qualitative research; Medicine; Social psychology; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078581,0.0005979827,0.0006186975,0.002037586,0.005977433,0.001891085,0.001697594,0.002254512,0.001846029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02552423,0.0008066526,0.0005527462,0.001375727,0.002682193,0.002110216,0.002828023,0.002657422,0.0004483162],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002127328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002982944,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003128978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008171604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922339,0.005512846,0.0004510422,0.0004803863,0.0006778935,0.0006440644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981419,0.01115714,0.00286492,0.00110192,0.001501371,0.001955575],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005761843,0.007675789,0.1611635,0.000709578,0.0000701167,0.05094203,0.739157,0.0005195098,0.003755612,0.001884253,0.001850382,0.03169609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001989396,0.006261416,0.07593498,0.0007344125,0.000102918,0.04880068,0.8386348,0.001989933,0.00352924,0.001643197,0.02194507,0.0002244499],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956917,0.0002701274,0.001930334,0.0003646539,0.00002161222,0.0004055316,0.0000610841,0.00001061339,0.001244312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931478,0.000694828,0.004346918,0.0002638735,0.00003769527,0.0004255175,0.00007518336,0.0000099149,0.000998284],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0078581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04155809,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08021398238873244,"score_gpt":0.4766213444970243,"score_spread":0.3964073621082919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}