{"id":"W2048088917","doi":"10.1007/s10694-009-0119-3","title":"Evaluation of the Fire Suppression Effectiveness of Manually Applied Compressed-Air-Foam (CAF) System","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fire Technology","topic":"Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Fire protection; Fire test; Firefighting; Compartment (ship); Compressed air; Fire performance; Waste management; Materials science; Composite material; Engineering; Chemistry; Geology; Fire resistance; Civil engineering; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004888733,0.0003994331,0.0003958285,0.0004632666,0.0003301288,0.0002646173,0.0004223516,0.0005266799,0.001694245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002036652,0.000125322,0.0002050225,0.0001688151,0.0002016811,0.0003351613,0.0002386898,0.0001580637,0.0002408715],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002029216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003581999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002651072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001418228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996991,0.00008133434,0.00002661247,0.00004408513,0.00009372253,0.00005518809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989169,0.000430458,0.00007876981,0.00006640228,0.0004444232,0.00006318712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01610186,0.001568028,0.01507827,0.0008582897,0.0001457691,0.0004012836,0.0004099795,0.0423433,0.7398916,0.0004154837,0.001016382,0.1817697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005381128,0.01320682,0.03607203,0.00005403733,0.0004216597,0.0005399481,0.0004884001,0.2575255,0.688025,0.000130139,0.002920783,0.00007748252],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.986112,0.0002457935,0.01151908,0.00003472439,0.00005623745,0.00005971546,0.00006860837,0.000334638,0.001569237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970118,0.00007500988,0.002384758,0.0000135652,0.000009168759,0.00001409221,0.00006410212,0.000008741918,0.0004188137],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002651072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005667746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007596346702665665,"score_gpt":0.2334360887671738,"score_spread":0.2258397420645081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}