{"id":"W2048088917","doi":"10.1007/s10694-009-0119-3","title":"Evaluation of the Fire Suppression Effectiveness of Manually Applied Compressed-Air-Foam (CAF) System","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fire Technology","topic":"Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Fire protection; Fire test; Firefighting; Compartment (ship); Compressed air; Fire performance; Waste management; Materials science; Composite material; Engineering; Chemistry; Geology; Fire resistance; Civil engineering; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004849692,0.0001127878,0.0002238192,0.00007542692,0.0000381624,0.000002661417,0.0002908506,0.0002412302,0.000009504794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004491421,0.00008992689,0.00004643375,0.0003231113,0.00005888094,0.0000312219,0.00004158799,0.0001447648,0.000005125266],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002588757,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002917666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002824844,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991075,0.00008128761,0.000243799,0.0001253743,0.0003189685,0.0001231099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992597,0.00005115262,0.00008901728,0.0004260115,0.0001606744,0.00001349753],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007477713,0.0001731096,0.001332493,0.001335884,0.000144836,0.000001386507,0.0002316932,0.2959062,0.4308213,0.04760757,0.0005606934,0.2218101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001077012,0.00007889661,0.04919582,0.0004573043,0.0001258927,0.000008206536,0.0001894527,0.6769433,0.2681692,0.003476189,0.0001131195,0.0001656031],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931607,0.00033485,0.001782559,0.0000751785,0.000184263,0.0005410095,0.00001424998,0.0004166222,0.003490539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997717,0.000007119852,0.0001352201,0.000004832084,0.000009154734,0.000040891,0.00001106389,0.00001275326,0.000007311456],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3810372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3667112,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007596346702665665,"score_gpt":0.2334360887671738,"score_spread":0.2258397420645081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}