{"id":"W2048114081","doi":"10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.10.027","title":"Radiation induced dissolution of UO2 based nuclear fuel – A critical review of predictive modelling approaches","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Nuclear Materials","topic":"Radioactive element chemistry and processing","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Spent nuclear fuel; Dissolution; Nuclear fuel; Uranium dioxide; Nuclear engineering; Reaction rate; Work (physics); Reaction rate constant; Uranium; Homogeneous; Experimental data; Chemistry; Environmental science; Materials science; Thermodynamics; Kinetics; Physics; Mathematics; Physical chemistry; Statistics; Metallurgy; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001102127,0.0003674823,0.002302548,0.0001188465,0.0000565255,0.00003575779,0.000430206,0.0004289435,0.00203259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004620909,0.000307324,0.0005619771,0.0001397686,0.0001129728,0.0003105561,0.00005276093,0.0004143918,0.000004328108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001607559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002491747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003318961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.024596e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967501,0.0002318741,0.002132198,0.0002507794,0.0004124725,0.0002226457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952858,0.0001843585,0.003794773,0.0002986232,0.0003222662,0.0001141899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000388693,0.0004957967,5.910908e-7,0.8802953,0.0007144975,0.00001154784,0.0003042494,0.0000143962,0.03046904,0.0002831285,0.0002714224,0.08675134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009062997,0.000385613,0.000003734789,0.6155727,0.006834676,0.0002417836,0.0001790151,0.0003115562,0.01673216,0.0003422487,0.3576124,0.0008778637],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00109453,0.9962188,0.00007176425,0.00002770158,0.0001933141,0.0001689303,0.0002042373,0.00001539906,0.002005347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01524716,0.98298,0.00115884,0.00001706636,0.0004527027,0.000004856891,0.00004476287,0.0000886444,0.000006016544],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.357341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999379,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1585459316337496,"score_gpt":0.3233427661731892,"score_spread":0.1647968345394396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}