{"id":"W2048128654","doi":"10.1615/specialtopicsrevporousmedia.v2.i4.40","title":"ROCK TYPE DETERMINATION OF A CARBONATE RESERVOIR USING VARIOUS APPROACHES: A CASE STUDY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Special Topics & Reviews in Porous Media An International Journal","topic":"Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Petroleum Technology Research Centre; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Geology; Capillary pressure; Petroleum reservoir; Permeability (electromagnetism); Carbonate; Saturation (graph theory); Dimensionless quantity; Carbonate rock; Capillary action; Geotechnical engineering; Porosity; Mineralogy; Petroleum engineering; Porous medium; Chemistry; Mechanics; Sedimentary rock; Geochemistry; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006451135,0.0003587226,0.0004466362,0.001355502,0.0005331137,0.0005813869,0.0007028014,0.000736305,0.0005108293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001888555,0.0002922375,0.0004566518,0.001194204,0.0005256197,0.0004726929,0.0004881867,0.00029023,0.0001026782],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004464207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000466259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01080381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02261568,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994961,0.00008162006,0.00003573805,0.00009173954,0.000243865,0.00005088448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998861,0.0005587965,0.0001051325,0.0001104599,0.0002928371,0.00007187886],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001345068,0.001147643,0.3975338,0.00103398,0.0002452202,0.02444496,0.003015168,0.1230522,0.2027895,0.002101448,0.001008169,0.2422829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008741579,0.001454989,0.1694452,0.00005799809,0.0002089593,0.007350593,0.002414974,0.5762737,0.2379923,0.001280124,0.003251546,0.000182203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848737,0.0001338372,0.01362745,0.00003878553,0.000003827048,0.00007835818,0.0001501213,0.00006366636,0.001030243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810048,0.0001055637,0.01833965,0.000006349962,0.00000257728,0.00001331193,0.00007652073,0.00001002035,0.0004413325],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01080381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02148187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1255131444273749,"score_gpt":0.3195018573720366,"score_spread":0.1939887129446617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}