{"id":"W2048138202","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2011.04.001","title":"Comparison of three strategies of trunk support during asymmetric two-handed reach in standing","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Ergonomics","topic":"Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Queen's University","funders":"Ontario Partnership for Innovation and Commercialization","keywords":"Trunk; Pelvis; Kinematics; Lumbar; Torso; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Medicine; Electromyography; Rotation (mathematics); Physical therapy; Mathematics; Anatomy; Orthodontics; Physics; Geometry; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003381042,0.0001136887,0.0004579473,0.0003359024,0.00001881977,0.000003548151,0.00007550649,0.00008123103,0.00005254585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002778602,0.0001039334,0.00007558801,0.000302442,0.0000965595,0.00005453117,0.00002800935,0.0001371017,0.000003142304],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008890993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007565993,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001546493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001675721,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989505,0.00001437774,0.0005728091,0.0001769951,0.0001175862,0.0001677272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993932,0.00007817471,0.0002087657,0.0002338742,0.00003437646,0.00005157535],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003324126,0.001276044,0.5940224,0.003163788,0.0001819172,0.000002472391,0.01024023,0.0004721891,0.2859309,0.0857005,0.00003336079,0.01565213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00232419,0.0002784732,0.9449289,0.00006686585,0.00002909142,7.426165e-7,0.00551257,0.0003045744,0.04465487,0.001787828,0.000007146184,0.0001047852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9640402,0.00004406941,0.0005628237,0.000005220072,0.00005416467,0.0003679738,0.000003179695,0.0000181655,0.03490424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974228,0.00001499843,0.002471126,0.000003788496,0.0000251552,0.00001360287,0.00001797058,0.00001621129,0.00001431822],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3509065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4238281,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04349748411712371,"score_gpt":0.3124324162866246,"score_spread":0.2689349321695009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}