{"id":"W2048215306","doi":"10.4296/cwrj2802199","title":"Case Studies of Instream Flow Modelling for Fish Habitat in Canadian Prairie Rivers","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Habitat; Hydrograph; Hydrology (agriculture); Environmental science; Fish habitat; Natural (archaeology); River management; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Geography; Drainage basin; Geology; Fishery; Cartography; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001179907,0.0006760294,0.000438851,0.00108021,0.00248347,0.001761465,0.001801902,0.00138825,0.001669978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002939443,0.0004489413,0.0008721981,0.002295038,0.001301918,0.0005539558,0.0007643502,0.0007874799,0.0001063837],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01404228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007555611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9363829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9716576,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991567,0.0002734773,0.00004987288,0.0001173293,0.0001958955,0.000206672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986666,0.0007241149,0.00007166202,0.00008712401,0.0003180452,0.0001323376],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001034067,0.0001966015,0.08418851,0.0000919983,0.00007043442,0.001645786,0.001239375,0.8938357,0.001016615,0.003961877,0.002645285,0.01100436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004543335,0.0001076441,0.05938459,0.00005468118,0.00007175789,0.0002392621,0.00274582,0.9293214,0.00101854,0.001281538,0.005629138,0.0001001447],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873335,0.0001968632,0.003606946,0.0003190731,0.0000122432,0.0001186649,0.001014237,0.00008523245,0.007313179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869652,0.0002064765,0.009441611,0.0000365809,0.000004538761,0.00006864737,0.000462347,0.00002516291,0.002789348],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06361705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1279833,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02432822657606667,"score_gpt":0.2165749067899302,"score_spread":0.1922466802138636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}