{"id":"W2048253733","doi":"10.1890/05-0549","title":"ANALYZING BETA DIVERSITY: PARTITIONING THE SPATIAL VARIATION OF COMMUNITY COMPOSITION DATA","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Monographs","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1297,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Beta diversity; Ordination; Variation (astronomy); Ecology; Community structure; Alpha diversity; Abundance (ecology); Composition (language); Variance (accounting); Community; Spatial variability; Biodiversity; Table (database); Statistics; Mathematics; Ecosystem; Biology; Computer science; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00687465,0.000481059,0.000429356,0.004207976,0.0005750111,0.0009522978,0.0006863195,0.0004613402,0.0003310526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02919475,0.0003375314,0.0007879024,0.002209855,0.001226284,0.001258336,0.001109095,0.000906396,0.0001205618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008062461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004835282,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009349745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005751866,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957671,0.002847558,0.0001457228,0.0005716965,0.0004988361,0.0001690825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732549,0.0221501,0.001305632,0.001584819,0.001361847,0.0003426378],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006366724,0.0002050499,0.5651154,0.0002636091,0.0008298046,0.0004597811,0.002553987,0.1548853,0.01349637,0.01336759,0.001545719,0.2466406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005936273,0.0001894404,0.1747035,0.00006994286,0.00009483316,0.0003706154,0.001170677,0.7629426,0.005585345,0.05214573,0.002556929,0.0001110458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.7381802,0.0005171768,0.2594338,0.0001957622,0.00002658201,0.00008746798,0.0003735283,0.000195282,0.0009902742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9287153,0.0001448479,0.07004304,0.00004545566,0.0000205072,0.0000725928,0.0007702201,0.00006116752,0.0001268981],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009349745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03635705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03967490759516592,"score_gpt":0.2605316305952818,"score_spread":0.2208567230001159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}