{"id":"W2048367209","doi":"10.1080/14926156.2012.704128","title":"The Fallacy of Composition: Prospective Mathematics Teachers’ Use of Logical Fallacies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education","topic":"Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Representativeness heuristic; Fallacy; Heuristic; Composition (language); Heuristics; Informal logic; Perspective (graphical); Logical reasoning; Mathematics education; Epistemology; Psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Argumentation theory; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006535577,0.0001854265,0.0002897258,0.001015183,0.001329903,0.004542313,0.0008765106,0.001091877,0.003830709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06414998,0.0006933365,0.000246412,0.0006650884,0.003403172,0.003410013,0.003084858,0.002675883,0.0003877653],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007380574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002601571,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01199359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01387582,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962749,0.001513672,0.000339659,0.0003694909,0.00119137,0.0003109577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9446132,0.03085658,0.01405137,0.003409092,0.004862024,0.002207737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004480617,0.0004193436,0.8087669,0.00009567702,0.00003464273,0.0005600753,0.1513524,0.0003061904,0.002525659,0.004747349,0.0004964899,0.03024726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004946925,0.0004703903,0.7247078,0.0002343158,0.0001060646,0.002360133,0.2478925,0.002210927,0.003505188,0.009240905,0.009116841,0.0001054331],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967847,0.000083989,0.0003009937,0.0002393313,0.000009428582,0.00000803657,0.00001045554,0.000003893799,0.002559283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991218,0.0000821935,0.0002352489,0.00003164958,0.000002541414,0.000006984921,0.00001763252,0.000004499888,0.0004975352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01199359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03456384,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03821486338818002,"score_gpt":0.3265832047267804,"score_spread":0.2883683413386003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}