{"id":"W2048449366","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.05.006","title":"Using the Illness Intrusiveness Ratings Scale to understand health-related quality of life in chronic disease","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","topic":"Diabetes Management and Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":301,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; University of Toronto; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Psychology; Clinical psychology; Psychosocial; Psychometrics; Quality of life (healthcare); Intrusiveness; Construct validity; Psychological intervention; Discriminant validity; Test validity; Rating scale; Psychiatry; Developmental psychology; Internal consistency; Psychotherapist","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002003496,0.0008664858,0.002869151,0.001531922,0.0001853956,0.0007900707,0.0009540492,0.0007219961,0.001532136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002927365,0.0002941057,0.001376919,0.001470301,0.0004772268,0.0007558643,0.0006291766,0.00137453,0.0004088351],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005827034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006239479,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00311726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009644982,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990823,0.0003233755,0.0001383178,0.00009733813,0.0003250253,0.00003359514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982008,0.001202128,0.0003014856,0.00002250755,0.0002313454,0.00004166456],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002251713,0.0001487292,0.007469207,0.01787538,0.001256234,0.00008062013,0.0001575068,0.0001730029,0.0003176632,0.0004410208,0.004399821,0.9674556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001312615,0.002988006,0.5409119,0.08601706,0.01119427,0.008233824,0.003498336,0.003575659,0.002755077,0.005600058,0.3333311,0.0005821143],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004895858,0.9926266,0.0004565226,0.000305796,0.0001672673,0.00006597792,0.0001303929,0.000007639611,0.001343821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03100774,0.9650626,0.002151824,0.0002748001,0.0001782591,0.0001325827,0.0002511699,0.000004752156,0.0009363452],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00311726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01059562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.391753174131226,"score_gpt":0.5608230425970634,"score_spread":0.1690698684658374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}