{"id":"W2048515540","doi":"10.1139/x07-099","title":"The impact of spatial heterogeneity on selection: a case study on <i>Pinus pinaster</i> breeding seedling orchards","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria","keywords":"Pinus pinaster; Selection (genetic algorithm); Genetic gain; Seedling; Spatial analysis; Biology; Heritability; Statistics; Spatial distribution; Spatial variability; Tree (set theory); Agronomy; Forestry; Ecology; Mathematics; Genetic variation; Geography; Evolutionary biology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00320484,0.000307059,0.0004872453,0.0004833906,0.000864998,0.0007002231,0.000587776,0.0004181343,0.0005401053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00648839,0.0001641786,0.0006031776,0.000870008,0.0008144823,0.0005257828,0.0007144283,0.0002917614,0.00005772382],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009675628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000446628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02219934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05178249,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977817,0.001474342,0.00009627855,0.0002526211,0.000242473,0.0001525444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985994,0.01114265,0.001238049,0.0008173903,0.000579227,0.0002286934],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006536811,0.000286306,0.8906592,0.0001836443,0.0004720239,0.00511864,0.001591413,0.04880949,0.01100301,0.001007493,0.00029476,0.03992046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005933353,0.001702331,0.9083413,0.00003755479,0.0004732119,0.003621172,0.002370892,0.07434576,0.006222915,0.00129802,0.001423687,0.0001037819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982293,0.00008049894,0.001328927,0.00002666526,0.000001204688,0.00001372203,0.00001952503,0.000008398812,0.0002918164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985086,0.00004356543,0.001310068,0.000008698807,0.000002446114,0.000006164208,0.00002258217,0.000004203986,0.000093612],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02219934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04414022,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06511458312873908,"score_gpt":0.3389689736956409,"score_spread":0.2738543905669019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}