{"id":"W2048710089","doi":"10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.07.012","title":"A methodology to determine the adhesion force of arbitrarily shaped drops with convex contact lines","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects","topic":"Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Contact angle; Regular polygon; Line (geometry); Drop (telecommunication); Surface tension; Geometry; Adhesion; Optics; Contact force; Materials science; Mechanics; Physics; Classical mechanics; Mathematics; Composite material; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001427474,0.0001633321,0.0003262753,0.00002633939,0.00006448608,0.00005806974,0.0001167392,0.00005441217,0.00003172732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007391923,0.0001003406,0.00002988761,0.0001442593,0.00008993199,0.00009058317,0.00006326606,0.00008754123,0.0000057919],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009283029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001700029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002139758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005742872,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991991,0.0000313831,0.0001789435,0.0002589612,0.0001220206,0.0002096094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992428,0.0003475053,0.00004168426,0.0001655238,0.00007463864,0.0001278507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004208005,0.00002223147,0.0002452628,0.00004783838,0.000009801437,7.872009e-7,0.0003870366,0.0002390125,0.9983261,0.0005305703,0.00002208633,0.0001271854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004213552,0.0002101805,0.008927695,0.00005617008,0.00001968693,0.00001011864,0.0001865666,0.03234802,0.9572266,0.0003039097,0.00009021003,0.0001994812],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979364,0.000269364,0.001022228,0.0003281774,0.00005168291,0.0002611868,0.000006629545,0.00004679495,0.00007749566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959219,0.00002384386,0.003797595,0.0001138402,0.00002944549,0.0000342597,0.000001768348,0.00001311119,0.00006420926],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0410995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4091772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02249580146451087,"score_gpt":0.2266554465869021,"score_spread":0.2041596451223913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}