{"id":"W2048866547","doi":"10.1016/j.cpc.2004.06.008","title":"Different Fokker–Planck approaches to simulate electron transport in plasmas","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer Physics Communications","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Isotropy; Fokker–Planck equation; Anisotropy; Physics; Electron; Legendre polynomials; Distribution function; Statistical physics; Relaxation (psychology); Code (set theory); Computational physics; Classical mechanics; Quantum mechanics; Partial differential equation; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000080196,0.0001726022,0.0002075854,0.00008318367,0.0001358428,0.00004226642,0.0008687858,0.00002420054,0.0004387274],"category_scores_gemma":[7.530771e-7,0.0001742518,0.00008354886,0.0003356442,0.0000536967,0.0000324635,0.0003768997,0.0003162911,0.0000678166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002831128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007347973,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003926568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002962067,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989166,0.00006036237,0.0002698161,0.0002497063,0.0001827039,0.0003208631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998428,0.0001008231,0.000047607,0.001278687,0.00003500843,0.0001098878],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003641421,0.002556038,0.03907589,0.00003369856,0.0001223432,0.000001739588,0.003090467,0.03485624,0.001396977,0.6176134,0.0005712888,0.3006456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008367268,0.0007834222,0.2814506,0.0003559194,0.00009837311,0.000001324998,0.000395945,0.5357292,0.00564864,0.1151751,0.0499365,0.002057791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6766933,0.00004526136,0.2579211,0.008241338,0.00008641741,0.001365806,0.00003460408,0.00008816818,0.05552401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987676,0.000004533034,0.01155145,0.00007624239,0.0001127384,0.0001619189,0.0001916044,0.0000165334,0.0002090229],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5024383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7105783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09166694244416058,"score_gpt":0.2808830007027139,"score_spread":0.1892160582585533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}