{"id":"W2048866547","doi":"10.1016/j.cpc.2004.06.008","title":"Different Fokker–Planck approaches to simulate electron transport in plasmas","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer Physics Communications","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Isotropy; Fokker–Planck equation; Anisotropy; Physics; Electron; Legendre polynomials; Distribution function; Statistical physics; Relaxation (psychology); Code (set theory); Computational physics; Classical mechanics; Quantum mechanics; Partial differential equation; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001617741,0.001213584,0.001958891,0.001644504,0.002279005,0.002356448,0.004118234,0.006529982,0.003388988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007252492,0.001026511,0.002537506,0.001772603,0.002365926,0.003526127,0.001805386,0.003106044,0.0005915869],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003068582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001202901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01687217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005280071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999393,0.0002567768,0.00003899915,0.00005087991,0.0001529715,0.0001074322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982569,0.0009055155,0.00009098684,0.0002564781,0.000299273,0.000190863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008531772,0.00008239615,0.0003751857,0.00007357744,0.00007140462,0.0001028288,0.0001511773,0.9206502,0.0009255204,0.07446736,0.0006554938,0.002359435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002889782,0.000007141971,0.00006390941,0.000007299118,0.000008448123,0.00001047316,0.0000170179,0.9903499,0.0002040274,0.008920491,0.0003689918,0.00001350882],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3917417,0.004837011,0.5126938,0.006317961,0.001605541,0.0004851344,0.0008896909,0.001299246,0.08012995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9034735,0.001969317,0.07102975,0.001097131,0.0005097722,0.0007401857,0.0005666831,0.0007409431,0.01987266],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01687217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03354794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09166694244416058,"score_gpt":0.2808830007027139,"score_spread":0.1892160582585533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}