{"id":"W2048893851","doi":"10.1139/f09-175","title":"Hierarchical analysis of multiple noisy abundance indices","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stock assessment; Estimator; Relative species abundance; Abundance (ecology); Statistics; Econometrics; Catch per unit effort; Fish stock; Fishery; Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Fishing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01027679,0.0006948565,0.001234954,0.002383249,0.0007506386,0.00140998,0.001551168,0.0006493624,0.001586435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03895191,0.000737871,0.001468925,0.00215239,0.001206688,0.002139095,0.001902844,0.001292401,0.0002868852],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001599562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001275917,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01310444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01898891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947054,0.002195518,0.0003126627,0.001201081,0.001188183,0.0003971723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762857,0.01375695,0.003454645,0.003263607,0.002872416,0.0003665913],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004454173,0.0002637513,0.1687681,0.0003173194,0.001171461,0.0008171335,0.001856817,0.5015425,0.0116497,0.07962139,0.002681242,0.2308652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002009677,0.00006507293,0.02520706,0.00002322403,0.00009848713,0.0000613048,0.0001210201,0.9431918,0.00118802,0.02921926,0.0007493077,0.00005540455],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1545241,0.0001782318,0.843491,0.0001354838,0.00002377982,0.00008556715,0.0002800522,0.0003188217,0.0009629036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7783723,0.0001060239,0.2190804,0.00007978307,0.00003829183,0.0001549956,0.0006900163,0.00008983958,0.001388353],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01310444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05434948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01808914405404781,"score_gpt":0.2425610863709451,"score_spread":0.2244719423168973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}