{"id":"W2048900223","doi":"10.1179/2049396714y.0000000103","title":"Ethics, morality, and conflicting interests: how questionable professional integrity in some scientists supports global corporate influence in public health","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Public relations; Engineering ethics; Public health; Political science; Praxis; Public disclosure; Morality; Business; Medicine; Law; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005572498,0.0001778422,0.0003162898,0.0002273692,0.0001651151,0.0000694809,0.0002418265,0.0002720539,0.00006720992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004173132,0.000166812,0.00003492736,0.000127914,0.0004376355,0.0009370054,0.0002028983,0.002305319,0.000004410872],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001454178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001803432,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004880184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003838206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996722,0.001080313,0.0008388534,0.0002733517,0.0006686631,0.0004168595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978202,0.000260791,0.0007806398,0.00005816566,0.0001617969,0.0009183866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005528561,0.0005594343,0.9778994,0.00006596188,0.00003133454,0.0001037065,0.001357277,0.0002179135,0.00004235189,0.01086019,0.000614327,0.007695256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002458617,0.0002755883,0.977546,0.0002228048,0.000003734269,0.0005291868,0.001373195,0.001561151,0.00002847947,0.007121648,0.008724014,0.0001555383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9106392,0.001187547,0.00003976071,0.08638219,0.001197647,0.0002113955,0.000307147,0.000007344158,0.00002781644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98724,0.0009139941,0.0002979434,0.01115229,0.0002020096,0.000008135591,0.0001175728,0.000006788681,0.00006130478],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07660081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6438618425657887,"score_gpt":0.6034348700977468,"score_spread":0.04042697246804194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}