{"id":"W2049096615","doi":"10.1142/s146433320600244x","title":"WORKSHOP APPROACH TO DEVELOPING OBJECTIVES, TARGETS AND INDICATORS FOR USE IN SEA","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Strategic environmental assessment; Process (computing); Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Plan (archaeology); Workload; Environmental impact assessment; Strategic planning; Environmental science; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Process management; Operations research; Business; Engineering; Geography; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03863499,0.002004255,0.000954127,0.004197878,0.00528063,0.01062766,0.006076549,0.003988122,0.02860143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03313438,0.001399751,0.002069559,0.003894037,0.003459935,0.005320282,0.01175861,0.007587891,0.01508493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006010594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0121387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00379531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006028071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9759867,0.01529552,0.001907323,0.00203787,0.003445708,0.00132692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785987,0.006966698,0.001674325,0.002382244,0.008005413,0.002372639],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006700743,0.002532592,0.00332324,0.003396477,0.0002267828,0.002782996,0.06803073,0.009459306,0.01542706,0.2740059,0.1445282,0.4756165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000155416,0.0006172273,0.002147741,0.001093128,0.00007565539,0.0006410771,0.02574784,0.00711914,0.007307062,0.08857308,0.8662825,0.000240161],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01073398,0.0005400258,0.8280066,0.008933669,0.001905243,0.01185098,0.001589493,0.001533352,0.1349068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0454094,0.0006461329,0.8647,0.002606613,0.0002132061,0.01300368,0.001285341,0.0006047684,0.07153098],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03863499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2043238,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01597604908511598,"score_gpt":0.2813791668346729,"score_spread":0.2654031177495569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}