{"id":"W2049392012","doi":"10.1080/14649360600600817","title":"The representation of Mongolia in contemporary travel writing: imaginative geographies of a travellers' frontier","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Cultural Geography","topic":"Travel Writing and Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Frontier; Conceptualization; Representation (politics); Tourism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Scholarship; Colonialism; Travel writing; Object (grammar); Relevance (law); Optimal distinctiveness theory; Aesthetics; History; Literature; Political science; Linguistics; Law; Art; Psychology; Archaeology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001716098,0.0001659647,0.0003032758,0.0001907163,0.0003970265,0.000134554,0.0001695962,0.00007102467,0.00002723891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000133358,0.0001137851,0.0003578012,0.0003126774,0.001374198,0.000251637,0.00001806169,0.000204765,6.162601e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000605913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000150095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005133195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006700227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987072,0.0001180234,0.0005047566,0.0001906672,0.0002509724,0.0002283772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992002,0.00008173218,0.0002780681,0.00009575623,0.0003241339,0.00002014293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003210132,0.000436686,0.1395375,0.0001701676,0.0003209356,0.000009536582,0.2532897,0.000004248358,0.00220765,0.5656216,0.03170908,0.006371839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001315215,0.0000916138,0.7114968,0.000120307,0.00003691279,9.860826e-7,0.250734,0.00001276371,0.001124134,0.01507243,0.01967268,0.0003221306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8889532,0.003322025,0.000002983773,0.000691136,0.0002117133,0.0002981802,0.0002041363,0.00003391997,0.1062827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981126,0.00005821616,0.00003262305,0.00002701509,0.000353724,0.00002257712,0.00009068987,0.00001083762,0.001291669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5719593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7759889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02465830086381438,"score_gpt":0.2614521550088,"score_spread":0.2367938541449856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}