{"id":"W2049392012","doi":"10.1080/14649360600600817","title":"The representation of Mongolia in contemporary travel writing: imaginative geographies of a travellers' frontier","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Cultural Geography","topic":"Travel Writing and Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Frontier; Conceptualization; Representation (politics); Tourism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Scholarship; Colonialism; Travel writing; Object (grammar); Relevance (law); Optimal distinctiveness theory; Aesthetics; History; Literature; Political science; Linguistics; Law; Art; Psychology; Archaeology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002388762,0.0002758563,0.0002310322,0.002041307,0.007026246,0.005764856,0.0005025108,0.0007333856,0.001829088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003805506,0.0001656672,0.0001413398,0.002189078,0.009020181,0.002942639,0.002917223,0.001036112,0.0001274382],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004024393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001846448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01374324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02352068,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988202,0.0007667116,0.00005062063,0.00008298565,0.0001246275,0.0001548147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975067,0.001563361,0.0003637222,0.0002319962,0.000200745,0.0001334613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006398505,0.00000219532,0.001519673,0.00003268385,0.000001673115,0.0001867691,0.98864,0.00002307496,0.000281217,0.005731759,0.0001136633,0.00346092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001904978,0.00001890133,0.006801121,0.0001486356,0.000006621241,0.0003709907,0.961053,0.0001007348,0.0002914368,0.001276018,0.0299224,0.000008270626],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9639418,0.001991985,0.0008325668,0.001168497,0.00004607099,0.00000714787,0.00002358927,0.00001131811,0.03197706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983504,0.0002961155,0.0001346464,0.00002385948,0.000008389239,0.000002859496,0.000008194692,0.000004750999,0.00117083],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01374324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02919912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02465830086381438,"score_gpt":0.2614521550088,"score_spread":0.2367938541449856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}