{"id":"W2049665839","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.03.002","title":"What can be learned about peer effects using college roommates? Evidence from new survey data and students from disadvantaged backgrounds","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":348,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Peer effects; Disadvantaged; Variation (astronomy); Empirical evidence; Survey data collection; Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Higher education; Peer review; Peer group; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Economics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004187558,0.0001615642,0.0003964758,0.0001070526,0.0003730818,0.002209297,0.00129253,0.0001335611,0.0001294027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001183932,0.0001568596,0.0000552959,0.0001700247,0.0001196558,0.007600863,0.0002735796,0.0003222021,0.00000646274],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003598593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06343727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2742228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979081,0.0004583584,0.000570299,0.0002932932,0.0004239625,0.0003460542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968132,0.001575883,0.0006753906,0.0003875238,0.0002083968,0.0003395826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004570351,0.00004130993,0.9913111,0.000004948677,0.00008148992,0.000007307807,0.001872675,0.00009812033,0.00005326594,0.00002901349,0.005252404,0.001202615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001240645,0.00005085749,0.9765298,0.0002131455,0.00007451651,0.00000450445,0.004951509,0.001096199,0.0000410914,0.001278007,0.0142509,0.0002687972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914292,0.002591146,0.00008177667,0.003745739,0.001732317,0.0001148145,0.0002388158,0.000009501802,0.00005670157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899644,0.005642331,0.0008524737,0.0003359236,0.002320925,5.704395e-7,0.0001037618,0.00001952454,0.0007600503],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2107855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1647452608605262,"score_gpt":0.3909116260147189,"score_spread":0.2261663651541927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}