{"id":"W2049738679","doi":"10.1088/1751-8113/40/8/013","title":"Solving the Schrödinger equation using the finite difference time domain method","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Finite difference method; Applied mathematics; Finite-difference time-domain method; Mathematical analysis; Domain (mathematical analysis); Schrödinger equation; Time domain; Mathematical physics; Physics; Computer science; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005086993,0.0003087917,0.0005108701,0.0003721983,0.000406713,0.0005025549,0.0007131851,0.0008795831,0.002792679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001024106,0.0001897603,0.0005887945,0.0003600806,0.0005730737,0.0009242051,0.0004547546,0.0007681323,0.0005876572],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003485082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001076368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001806177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001202463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997523,0.00005245923,0.00001662707,0.00002854875,0.0001326416,0.00001735851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996127,0.0002178409,0.00002448652,0.00003695552,0.00009706019,0.00001096214],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008171402,0.00012717,0.001033044,0.0005634602,0.00008275786,0.0005336039,0.0003751965,0.4791929,0.08134126,0.3230669,0.003259276,0.1103427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002615449,0.00002628051,0.0001300426,0.00001498165,0.000008305934,0.0001760051,0.00002570572,0.9655276,0.009386878,0.01964007,0.005016849,0.00002104176],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.00647701,0.0001297895,0.9894438,0.0001640429,0.00007023758,0.00004109502,0.00003078212,0.0001194236,0.003523903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1069192,0.0005350905,0.8843291,0.0001756542,0.00005075553,0.0001716145,0.0001441911,0.00008681571,0.00758762],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002792679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009342492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02041540677687008,"score_gpt":0.295941137746852,"score_spread":0.275525730969982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}