{"id":"W2049892988","doi":"10.1006/ccog.2000.0430","title":"Ineffability of Qualia: A Straightforward Naturalistic Explanation","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Consciousness and Cognition","topic":"Multisensory perception and integration","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Qualia; Cognitive science; Perception; Subject (documents); Constructive; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Psychology; Externalism; Representation (politics); Epistemology; Phenomenon; Linguistics; Consciousness; Communication; Computer science; Neuroscience; Philosophy; Process (computing)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001232718,0.00008071744,0.0001250989,0.00005803435,0.00005969453,0.00001479459,0.00003152134,0.00009168727,0.01734918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002935467,0.00007127035,0.0000336576,0.00007906769,0.0001164506,0.0000967352,0.000003097095,0.00007612362,0.0001370531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009734483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008570315,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001212085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001051917,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993186,0.00009668001,0.0002263695,0.0001763,0.00009273978,0.00008933635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996248,0.00005715438,0.00005959087,0.0001009347,0.000118515,0.0000389467],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006508941,0.0004497762,0.00421511,0.0001109412,0.00007493483,0.000005969356,0.009700512,0.000004999613,0.01347873,0.02933278,0.002572455,0.9394029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004619299,0.0004733674,0.9616444,0.0001622191,0.0002037347,0.00008140827,0.007664931,0.001808159,0.002046123,0.01309068,0.007579347,0.0006262995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9751386,0.00007437384,0.0004369427,0.0001335923,0.0001679944,0.0001750846,0.00005910168,0.00003934569,0.02377496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983727,0.00004335441,0.00005161659,0.0001368896,0.00004411575,0.00003141574,0.00013498,0.00000548679,0.00117943],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9574293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9835491,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03040373419525784,"score_gpt":0.3257678987305743,"score_spread":0.2953641645353165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}