{"id":"W2049907037","doi":"10.1038/ejhg.2011.27","title":"Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies (GRIPS): explanation and elaboration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Human Genetics","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"U.S. Department of Health and Human Services","keywords":"Checklist; Multidisciplinary approach; Transparency (behavior); Risk assessment; Quality (philosophy); Strengths and weaknesses; Completeness (order theory); Risk analysis (engineering); Data science; Management science; Computer science; Medicine; Psychology; Engineering; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7501593,0.005382474,0.007358595,0.02100363,0.004271014,0.01008182,0.01024497,0.01585492,0.005225631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8862919,0.007970251,0.01396613,0.02036327,0.01049406,0.01820037,0.01806038,0.01909669,0.002610813],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01137562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04492034,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005771517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003987547,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1319455,0.4243676,0.3957486,0.006540112,0.03829633,0.003101907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.05117801,0.5893498,0.1381613,0.07703589,0.1421672,0.002107839],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00236437,0.000339128,0.01751924,0.1973718,0.005968226,0.001441292,0.03850338,0.007232977,0.003500945,0.0772726,0.2561736,0.3923125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003508769,0.001186457,0.01882542,0.2700571,0.007452595,0.001549538,0.00778509,0.02197663,0.009310153,0.1790659,0.4778831,0.001399199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.008139501,0.01582694,0.6240288,0.2314667,0.01369862,0.08890994,0.009646002,0.002701641,0.005581986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02493951,0.008834499,0.8254293,0.02535641,0.003188375,0.1078023,0.003178212,0.0003104197,0.0009610335],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2498407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3080981,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7629212036548187,"score_gpt":0.4826637727783911,"score_spread":0.2802574308764276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}