{"id":"W2049907037","doi":"10.1038/ejhg.2011.27","title":"Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies (GRIPS): explanation and elaboration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Human Genetics","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"U.S. Department of Health and Human Services","keywords":"Checklist; Multidisciplinary approach; Transparency (behavior); Risk assessment; Quality (philosophy); Strengths and weaknesses; Completeness (order theory); Risk analysis (engineering); Data science; Management science; Computer science; Medicine; Psychology; Engineering; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1041261,0.0001232816,0.0009266324,0.0002114306,0.0002042365,0.0001413843,0.0005067257,0.00001421899,0.0001598116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02234116,0.00005455249,0.0003116308,0.0002974618,0.00008465574,0.0001094715,0.00007232766,0.0001461833,0.00001375887],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000949923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001854597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":7.500465e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004462264,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9736516,0.007810527,0.01641225,0.0002256588,0.001808371,0.00009153385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598755,0.0004826761,0.03690501,0.0007300414,0.001955996,0.00005075457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002536335,0.00009055156,0.7188504,0.00007970232,0.0012929,0.00006553816,0.06198954,0.002404433,0.004880271,0.0003701975,0.01413915,0.195812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002916809,0.0006145623,0.9760209,0.0001133481,0.0008321218,0.0001181745,0.01274192,0.002148826,0.00086503,0.003033002,0.003106043,0.0001143526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800125,0.005245276,0.01285354,0.00002539048,0.0001995971,0.0001214446,0.000003227449,0.000001385026,0.001537585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863092,0.00058501,0.01276776,0.00001181212,0.0001661711,4.914589e-7,4.976634e-7,0.000008931826,0.0001500733],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2571706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9858941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7629212036548187,"score_gpt":0.4826637727783911,"score_spread":0.2802574308764276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}