{"id":"W2049963802","doi":"10.1007/s00442-004-1804-z","title":"Using animal movement paths to measure response to spatial scale","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oecologia","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Movement (music); Scale (ratio); Spatial ecology; Fractal dimension; Fractal; Biology; Habitat; Spatial heterogeneity; Ecology; Path analysis (statistics); Path (computing); Path coefficient; Correlation; Statistics; Mathematics; Cartography; Geometry; Geography; Computer science; Physics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008196087,0.000362451,0.000267594,0.001446524,0.0002299314,0.0004249598,0.0003374501,0.0004516941,0.002242111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007744122,0.0002862402,0.0002806928,0.001262134,0.0003461226,0.0006811224,0.0005722007,0.0004482919,0.0005243691],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003048972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002899861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005459603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008647493,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994053,0.0002348099,0.00002457088,0.0001503708,0.0001440124,0.00004096734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952974,0.002649196,0.0008788062,0.00039033,0.000568682,0.0002156059],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001663342,0.0004521025,0.7637172,0.0003956367,0.0007679784,0.00009363988,0.001339832,0.02309454,0.06618324,0.0008288581,0.001815777,0.1396478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007589669,0.0006190342,0.9345111,0.00002895946,0.0001312035,0.0003131642,0.0004603058,0.05223992,0.007892237,0.001647923,0.002028816,0.00005142142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.968904,0.000116799,0.02711636,0.00005733666,0.00003167297,0.00007675347,0.001035431,0.0002467147,0.002415031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799255,0.0001016405,0.01767513,0.00006809243,0.00001127121,0.0002254523,0.0007239977,0.00008650219,0.001182584],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005459603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01085567,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02118737345056708,"score_gpt":0.25134423041846,"score_spread":0.230156856967893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}