{"id":"W2049982137","doi":"10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.109.451","title":"Rapid Prototyping of Handicraft Based on Reverse Engineering","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Mechanics and Materials","topic":"Manufacturing Process and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Reverse engineering; Slicing; Handicraft; Merge (version control); Point cloud; Rapid prototyping; Computer science; Engineering drawing; Computer graphics (images); Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Artificial intelligence; Operating system; Information retrieval; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005924829,0.0008002101,0.0006911163,0.001337984,0.0004279354,0.001184905,0.0007603865,0.000669443,0.004766238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001093897,0.0005601811,0.0007739364,0.00072943,0.000472022,0.0007739581,0.000774106,0.000513982,0.001353842],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002634244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003924709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007965261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009075523,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991305,0.00006749979,0.00004689676,0.0001209591,0.0005405009,0.00009363182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989629,0.0003094171,0.00009340278,0.0003592305,0.0002333755,0.00004174249],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002268251,0.0001186306,0.001570102,0.0007612864,0.00005779183,0.001432334,0.0003322919,0.0495213,0.6095135,0.004306267,0.004125173,0.3280346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008609351,0.001046782,0.00720506,0.0001401161,0.00008536847,0.003738942,0.0002360316,0.1385475,0.7786125,0.002991387,0.06709503,0.0002151789],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1610386,0.001266432,0.8082443,0.000133665,0.0002544096,0.0005923295,0.0005240457,0.00515091,0.0227954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4789312,0.0007966951,0.5080528,0.00006322686,0.00004107777,0.0002747306,0.0006722725,0.0003997114,0.0107683],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004766238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0159446,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01201778100090894,"score_gpt":0.1666017408311388,"score_spread":0.1545839598302298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}