{"id":"W2050028569","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-7692.2004.tb01157.x","title":"DETERMINING BLUBBER FATTY ACID COMPOSITION: A COMPARISON OF <i>IN SITU</i> DIRECT AND TRADITIONAL METHODS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marine Mammal Science","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Blubber; In situ; Biology; Composition (language); Zoology; Fishery; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008602223,0.0001516092,0.0002929371,0.00005797444,0.0002116753,0.00003559,0.0003398699,0.00003093447,0.0004346894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006409665,0.0001391932,0.00004103651,0.0007391269,0.001019984,0.0003321634,0.001175173,0.0001253064,0.00002051777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002131911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002339944,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001168412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002053894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983335,0.00005663588,0.0003257275,0.000453253,0.0004857506,0.0003451935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995052,0.00008161646,0.0001101061,0.0001686216,0.00001316689,0.0001212745],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002367798,0.0001899265,0.769704,0.00002082194,0.000003953866,0.00001252576,0.0003359414,0.0005207622,0.114525,0.0007292966,0.00002037648,0.1139137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003999336,0.0001547808,0.9344268,0.00002181362,0.000008631443,0.00002335749,0.0000384924,0.0005837749,0.06286237,0.0009246303,0.0003893026,0.0001660462],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8908538,0.00003951813,0.0007881538,0.0002124667,0.00005902625,0.0001523481,0.000002273715,0.00002040046,0.107872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9265009,0.00001513334,0.07327475,0.0001524514,0.00001760503,0.00001377228,0.000001793037,0.000005467059,0.00001817531],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1647228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5676135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04149168612902705,"score_gpt":0.312010561029071,"score_spread":0.2705188749000439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}