{"id":"W2050028569","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-7692.2004.tb01157.x","title":"DETERMINING BLUBBER FATTY ACID COMPOSITION: A COMPARISON OF <i>IN SITU</i> DIRECT AND TRADITIONAL METHODS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marine Mammal Science","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Blubber; In situ; Biology; Composition (language); Zoology; Fishery; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001080544,0.0006930967,0.0003824213,0.001610725,0.0004589737,0.0006937503,0.0004234058,0.0007500562,0.001087147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001521798,0.0003124636,0.0003786487,0.0008646968,0.0004665671,0.0005661543,0.000570568,0.0005006536,0.0005084256],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004069516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002548905,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00286603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008499031,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990295,0.0001811861,0.00006049419,0.0003000673,0.0003404446,0.00008821231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988582,0.0003150815,0.0002909221,0.0001031109,0.0003534977,0.00007916256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004144184,0.00002919918,0.009888832,0.000232467,0.0001071256,0.00006181536,0.000233386,0.00009687377,0.9797665,0.00007823709,0.00004645763,0.009044677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002058937,0.0006924095,0.159174,0.00008724578,0.0003636933,0.001006605,0.0004710679,0.001921339,0.8310093,0.0002019501,0.004997175,0.00005470052],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.934781,0.008312952,0.05238335,0.00009650152,0.0001038807,0.0001402373,0.001036423,0.0001514759,0.0029943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8898188,0.008433831,0.09250851,0.0004834381,0.00008058875,0.0002370059,0.002550796,0.0001950952,0.005691715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00286603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005714536,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04149168612902705,"score_gpt":0.312010561029071,"score_spread":0.2705188749000439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}