{"id":"W2050029950","doi":"10.1007/s00033-007-7041-7","title":"Variational treatment of electrostatic interaction force in atomic force microscopy","year":2007,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik","topic":"Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Atomic force microscopy; Sobolev space; Surface (topology); Electrostatic force microscope; Space (punctuation); Fourier series; Classical mechanics; Physics; Mathematical analysis; Mathematics; Materials science; Nanotechnology; Geometry; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002393338,0.001152505,0.002070739,0.001341019,0.001404945,0.001998311,0.004327874,0.004448559,0.003912043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003901036,0.001302615,0.001361979,0.001178696,0.002819973,0.002866672,0.003103216,0.002755414,0.000708097],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002005571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002061266,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01011383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007661411,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990671,0.0004603151,0.0000395126,0.00007035054,0.0002587276,0.0001040517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988902,0.000504774,0.00006846408,0.0001519397,0.0002532704,0.0001313304],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002658442,0.00003683395,0.00009434995,0.00009340774,0.00003419045,0.00007694995,0.00006077213,0.1311891,0.001173939,0.862264,0.001692877,0.003257014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001939177,0.000007290039,0.00008603977,0.00001437179,0.00000568842,0.00001702638,0.0000146156,0.8405542,0.0001849479,0.1572434,0.00183813,0.00001493809],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01999713,0.003087504,0.9481503,0.003162967,0.0009911438,0.0001088485,0.0002355113,0.000176203,0.02409036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5286754,0.004745586,0.3737674,0.002221775,0.001999941,0.001082074,0.0005881502,0.001246301,0.08567337],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01011383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02010995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01211533225713668,"score_gpt":0.3313404294280631,"score_spread":0.3192250971709265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}