{"id":"W2050029950","doi":"10.1007/s00033-007-7041-7","title":"Variational treatment of electrostatic interaction force in atomic force microscopy","year":2007,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik","topic":"Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Atomic force microscopy; Sobolev space; Surface (topology); Electrostatic force microscope; Space (punctuation); Fourier series; Classical mechanics; Physics; Mathematical analysis; Mathematics; Materials science; Nanotechnology; Geometry; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003288046,0.0005953359,0.0008172316,0.0002989662,0.0002065705,0.0001146789,0.000308453,0.000178726,0.0001984107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006355887,0.0005803918,0.000359827,0.0006264455,0.0001351181,0.0002886661,0.00006612283,0.0002759057,0.0002450312],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001425215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002111665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005976757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006282932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997093,0.00006380313,0.00115734,0.0006166559,0.000292842,0.000776378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979914,0.0003178809,0.0007710402,0.0006203541,0.0001481247,0.0001512221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004412497,0.004175878,0.0009509429,0.000384461,0.0007279825,0.000004287989,0.006168779,0.0002744099,0.5578022,0.4221738,0.0006586156,0.006237358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003962645,0.001288851,0.0008636483,0.0006757297,0.0006306872,0.00000475878,0.0007663972,0.00381295,0.904308,0.05271371,0.02994878,0.001023902],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5751375,0.00411677,0.4018947,0.0002886597,0.0005762302,0.003562936,0.0009272241,0.0001606041,0.0133354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858475,0.000256925,0.01040359,0.00004793707,0.0005089798,0.0001797187,0.0008924031,0.0001025674,0.00176043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4107099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01211533225713668,"score_gpt":0.3313404294280631,"score_spread":0.3192250971709265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}