{"id":"W2050145907","doi":"10.1007/s11002-007-9022-1","title":"Demand and distribution relationships in the ready-to-drink iced tea market: A graphical approach","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marketing Letters","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Concordia University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Econometrics; Distribution (mathematics); Market share; Lag; Promotion (chess); Econometric model; Economics; Computer science; Marketing; Business; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009989128,0.0001695847,0.0002495106,0.0001961579,0.0002173635,0.000124987,0.0002347496,0.0001282924,0.00001226065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005982926,0.0001498656,0.00006691382,0.0003828628,0.00006355264,0.0001534389,0.00006268533,0.0004204383,0.00002010922],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007488923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000026974,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005242257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006176651,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983711,0.0001476066,0.0005781116,0.0004572209,0.00004630828,0.0003997065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986814,0.0007710956,0.0001822167,0.0002600089,0.00001231738,0.0000929995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004339587,0.0001562568,0.8757758,0.00008240416,0.00006604908,0.00001981712,0.001310163,0.00004313085,0.0002381654,0.02668206,0.09401418,0.001177997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003587203,0.00001813209,0.9687451,0.00001799535,0.000006303696,0.00001924256,0.0002201808,0.0002207169,0.000003375005,0.0006563144,0.02950191,0.0002320211],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9403738,0.0003567106,0.004039892,0.01358777,0.0001098432,0.000389569,0.00004052539,0.00003159554,0.04107029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952554,0.00004962103,0.001182457,0.003192339,0.0001300528,0.00002927969,0.00006254311,0.00001390112,0.00008441736],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09296928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6111341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02081946481045415,"score_gpt":0.1958071237926611,"score_spread":0.1749876589822069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}