{"id":"W2050163895","doi":"10.1038/hdy.2008.40","title":"Detecting recent speciation events: the case of the finless porpoise (genus Neophocaena)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Heredity","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Thornhill Medical (Canada)","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ocean Park Conservation Foundation, Hong Kong","keywords":"Biology; Monophyly; Sympatric speciation; Sympatry; Evolutionary biology; Genetic algorithm; Porpoise; Reproductive isolation; Genus; Zoology; Ecology; Phylogenetics; Clade; Genetics; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002805192,0.00008796935,0.0001068237,0.000004274714,0.0004173359,0.000003626879,0.0002272817,0.00003124704,0.001302434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001445768,0.00005095697,0.00006458147,0.0002602806,0.0001242746,0.00006320631,0.0004795729,0.0001301181,0.00008956041],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001636806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009819269,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006204447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01577643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991714,0.0001051675,0.0001773165,0.0001616914,0.0002260346,0.0001584034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994082,0.00007347742,0.0001575683,0.0003157859,0.00001411493,0.0000308464],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005179108,0.0002701372,0.7301531,0.00004522408,0.00005078212,0.0003407343,0.002802807,0.0004184133,0.0005018384,0.0000466365,0.02962091,0.2356976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001676332,0.00003194696,0.9410769,0.00001008616,0.00001662206,0.0003927514,0.0002483539,0.0001647513,0.001163837,0.0001511138,0.05648196,0.00009398888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871497,0.0001220198,0.000009815913,0.0004357129,0.0003063098,0.0002141434,0.000005370564,0.00001196288,0.011745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999104,0.0002610127,0.00006168149,0.0001829937,0.0001297911,0.000009740098,3.784741e-7,0.00000556344,0.0002448347],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2356036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996105,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03286742355857013,"score_gpt":0.2342470170380873,"score_spread":0.2013795934795171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}