{"id":"W2050166300","doi":"10.1021/es048734p","title":"Five-Stage Environmental Exposure Assessment Strategy for Mixtures:  Gasoline as a Case Study","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Technology","topic":"Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; ExxonMobil (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Component (thermodynamics); Gasoline; Environmental science; Stage (stratigraphy); Environmental risk assessment; Environmental impact assessment; Aggregate (composite); Group (periodic table); Risk assessment; Chemistry; Biochemical engineering; Waste management; Computer science; Engineering; Organic chemistry; Ecology; Geology; Materials science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004167831,0.001730973,0.0009128816,0.001828515,0.001237872,0.002484229,0.002525909,0.002074816,0.004094594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003283646,0.0006786734,0.001525648,0.001166021,0.0007512982,0.001849515,0.002411856,0.001035275,0.0005970644],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002396266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003005599,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01366118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02319961,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981018,0.001009228,0.0000942638,0.0001893078,0.0005118667,0.00009363383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999086,0.0004400134,0.00007994736,0.0000662787,0.0002828974,0.00004485428],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006318139,0.0009353622,0.01501445,0.0007928782,0.0003406423,0.003336329,0.00111274,0.7238291,0.03377426,0.06861338,0.003566943,0.1480522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006711693,0.0009199716,0.002851972,0.0001407241,0.0002129319,0.0006497678,0.001214035,0.9163393,0.02990461,0.02968359,0.01786632,0.0001495779],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0695482,0.000529461,0.9114566,0.0008206879,0.00003649762,0.001603534,0.0003796995,0.0008144706,0.01481084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3254817,0.0006903264,0.6624411,0.0001906172,0.00001800171,0.001134672,0.000444755,0.00007652433,0.009522313],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01366118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02716333,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009969427216831653,"score_gpt":0.2837614101404332,"score_spread":0.2737919829236015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}