{"id":"W2050195558","doi":"10.1007/s10853-009-4056-9","title":"The optimum contact angle range for metal foam stabilization: an experimental comparison with the theory","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Materials Science","topic":"Cellular and Composite Structures","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Materials science; Wetting; Liquidus; Metal foam; Composite material; Contact angle; Metal; Aluminium; Melting point; Ceramic; Foaming agent; Ceramic foam; Hexadecane; Metallurgy; Alloy; Porosity","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008850587,0.00007856124,0.0001324419,0.00002767513,0.000294875,0.000282101,0.0003906752,0.00001382885,0.00002785741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001127183,0.0000357502,0.00003204307,0.000087359,0.0001198448,0.0003051408,0.00001092575,0.00004433212,3.870401e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003267152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002960439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":6.634144e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001479497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993118,0.00004467486,0.0001903719,0.00006344733,0.0002412007,0.0001485073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995928,0.00005523716,0.00009392697,0.0001301754,0.0000810316,0.00004681615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001675357,0.00001562571,0.00001102017,0.000002306359,0.000007499444,0.000001098539,0.0006079827,0.003960134,0.9928128,0.001946167,0.00007748192,0.0003903394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003390388,0.0006067202,0.001288617,0.000008462112,0.00001752913,0.00006090083,0.001001726,0.001109166,0.9945799,0.0003745941,0.0005422827,0.00007112553],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916397,0.0008838433,0.006613141,0.0000931292,0.0004680166,0.0001353351,0.000003367432,0.00001363928,0.0001497745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991148,0.000006845932,0.0006741637,0.00003391464,0.0001553363,0.000002256116,5.543359e-7,0.000005787953,0.000006316007],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007475072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2720307,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01142551544780509,"score_gpt":0.2571656864764379,"score_spread":0.2457401710286329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}