{"id":"W2050195558","doi":"10.1007/s10853-009-4056-9","title":"The optimum contact angle range for metal foam stabilization: an experimental comparison with the theory","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Materials Science","topic":"Cellular and Composite Structures","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Materials science; Wetting; Liquidus; Metal foam; Composite material; Contact angle; Metal; Aluminium; Melting point; Ceramic; Foaming agent; Ceramic foam; Hexadecane; Metallurgy; Alloy; Porosity","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001013516,0.0002964386,0.0004492837,0.0006104687,0.0005691699,0.0005380615,0.0008399484,0.0005582407,0.004907855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003881013,0.0002467675,0.0002115866,0.0006251453,0.0006843964,0.001297931,0.0003724727,0.0004899818,0.0005567627],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003556537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000272516,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005098367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005765131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992393,0.0001811846,0.00004645963,0.0001821417,0.0002525693,0.0000984072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977559,0.001624846,0.0001204952,0.0002390355,0.0002146009,0.00004510247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001261989,0.00009568597,0.0007268815,0.0002321286,0.000009495161,0.00005785047,0.0001287142,0.002993731,0.9763187,0.001925071,0.0002497455,0.01600009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002565641,0.0003192031,0.0007828177,0.00000901452,0.00001082526,0.00006248849,0.00005695049,0.008280497,0.9894103,0.0003214708,0.0007064848,0.00001421362],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9513534,0.003107489,0.03855223,0.0002075297,0.0000845517,0.00004890724,0.0004220864,0.0002951713,0.005928592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968561,0.0002883412,0.002488233,0.00001422978,0.000008737253,0.00001317909,0.00007730003,0.00001527096,0.0002385058],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004907855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0164184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01142551544780509,"score_gpt":0.2571656864764379,"score_spread":0.2457401710286329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}