{"id":"W2050362227","doi":"10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.02.013","title":"A spatially explicit risk approach to support marine spatial planning in the German EEZ","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marine Environmental Research","topic":"Coastal and Marine Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Marine spatial planning; Exclusive economic zone; Spatial planning; Environmental resource management; Context (archaeology); Marine ecosystem; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Geography; Environmental planning; Ecology; Fishery; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001700194,0.0002856441,0.000220437,0.0001864192,0.0003235273,0.0001804118,0.001094581,0.0000673109,0.02027662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006364386,0.0002171723,0.00007797292,0.0004625414,0.0002327901,0.0002644395,0.01672107,0.0007372134,0.006223926],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004537283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001054673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03948566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002457541,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958363,0.0003726606,0.0003880048,0.0007626276,0.001616569,0.001023803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987577,0.0001427279,0.00006199338,0.0007689112,0.000003575669,0.0002651474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005845907,0.0007229142,0.5734302,0.00001075506,0.0000116435,0.00004765807,0.001272797,0.0007924712,0.0004450321,0.00008236356,0.007113606,0.416012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005182466,0.0004332797,0.9609349,0.000003580398,0.000006836165,0.00001242673,0.0005911934,0.002693419,0.0001051417,0.002747369,0.03168117,0.0002724303],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6885617,0.000001790178,0.0004201711,0.0005900888,0.00003671521,0.001543436,0.000006605272,0.00002289997,0.3088166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877461,0.00002957704,0.000971645,0.0004325556,0.0001047861,0.0008710438,0.000103223,0.00003667027,0.009704403],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4157396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02895956758707551,"score_gpt":0.2896079106384934,"score_spread":0.2606483430514179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}