{"id":"W2050573899","doi":"10.3905/jfi.2009.18.3.052","title":"Returns-Based Style Analysis of Convertible Bond Funds","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Fixed Income","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Convertible bond; Convertible arbitrage; Bond; Stock (firearms); Asset allocation; Common stock; Business; Portfolio; Returns-based style analysis; Convertible; Financial economics; Economics; Monetary economics; Institutional investor; Passive management; Finance; Capital asset pricing model; Corporate governance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00117833,0.0004500643,0.0002862154,0.004342503,0.0001946891,0.001237983,0.0004204413,0.0002809185,0.00247966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004914394,0.0001216842,0.0005017273,0.00240699,0.0001637677,0.0008894815,0.0004788848,0.000459946,0.0005514909],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001764597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003374309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00247908,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994856,0.00008123016,0.00004590585,0.00007238595,0.0002274186,0.00008738509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981336,0.0003159842,0.0006848674,0.0001785689,0.000511218,0.000175871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009867013,0.0002685155,0.764953,0.0001019377,0.0005147008,0.000964409,0.0003812824,0.0630573,0.009535144,0.02055961,0.005689162,0.1329883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003467769,0.0003246429,0.8549317,0.00002844492,0.000130521,0.0006166365,0.0002239623,0.1224956,0.007392508,0.005471244,0.008285882,0.00006416223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872973,0.0003273062,0.002316257,0.0000710901,0.00001334714,0.0000373514,0.001427234,0.0001055309,0.008404556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942712,0.0001677905,0.001146439,0.00002084332,0.00003796275,0.00001525312,0.001959577,0.00002530855,0.002355749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004342503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008295357,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03717632399619115,"score_gpt":0.2231872758389641,"score_spread":0.186010951842773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}