{"id":"W2050573899","doi":"10.3905/jfi.2009.18.3.052","title":"Returns-Based Style Analysis of Convertible Bond Funds","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Fixed Income","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Convertible bond; Convertible arbitrage; Bond; Stock (firearms); Asset allocation; Common stock; Business; Portfolio; Returns-based style analysis; Convertible; Financial economics; Economics; Monetary economics; Institutional investor; Passive management; Finance; Capital asset pricing model; Corporate governance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032552,0.000111828,0.0006229389,0.0005719195,0.0001096725,0.00001569553,0.0003487884,0.00006182636,0.0006215766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001105426,0.00008400166,0.000305637,0.0008481643,0.0001788544,0.0002195132,0.0000266203,0.0001789749,0.00001830477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005506782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006343055,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001279914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001694172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986885,0.00003227062,0.0009330141,0.00009077121,0.00008377882,0.0001716724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982576,0.0001472767,0.001158891,0.0002812612,0.00009674557,0.00005820195],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001136607,0.000618259,0.8099824,0.0001384198,0.003523819,0.00005801348,0.003399844,0.004428122,0.001559644,0.15903,0.01583625,0.0002885706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001475737,0.0008335341,0.9631017,0.00004762419,0.0003848415,0.0000262526,0.0002585665,0.006284733,0.001628284,0.01382091,0.01183121,0.0003066411],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.982388,0.00224546,0.0005100274,0.000449126,0.0002354039,0.00005710591,0.00005156641,0.000005399983,0.01405791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984655,0.0005486988,0.0003258596,0.0002980792,0.00005979975,7.92188e-7,0.000003006289,0.000009598986,0.0002885995],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1531192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6805828,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03717632399619115,"score_gpt":0.2231872758389641,"score_spread":0.186010951842773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}