{"id":"W2050638560","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0096928","title":"Influence of Artifact Removal on Rare Species Recovery in Natural Complex Communities Using High-Throughput Sequencing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Chinese Academy of Sciences","keywords":"Artifact (error); Pyrosequencing; Biology; DNA sequencing; Biodiversity; Throughput; Rare species; Plankton; Biomass (ecology); Taxon; Ecology; Habitat; Evolutionary biology; Computer science; Genetics; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001774241,0.000164077,0.0002962692,0.00005669996,0.0001863887,0.00001448737,0.0002924986,0.00004939889,0.0003122976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000708915,0.0001672952,0.00003918292,0.0001464132,0.0006021121,0.0003060215,0.0004894901,0.0002145871,0.0001534196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006689701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002570242,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002698315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004232856,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987017,0.0001278047,0.0002402174,0.0002004753,0.0004745285,0.0002552882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993289,0.0001758774,0.0001269678,0.0003272674,0.00000643086,0.00003459808],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005275229,0.000314276,0.5999697,0.00004895522,0.0000492006,0.000008655462,0.001747986,0.03192275,0.3656727,0.00004453256,0.00005001274,0.0001184811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003017084,0.0001612489,0.9345921,0.0002578995,0.00002793723,0.000002568819,0.001323494,0.001530261,0.06130539,0.0002326828,0.00003674035,0.0002279518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978012,0.00001905086,0.000004418098,0.00008336861,0.00002273053,0.000160573,0.00002470943,0.0000245632,0.001859367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857933,0.00005323474,0.01371787,0.0002794142,0.00001648731,0.000002047913,0.00001108036,0.000009717965,0.0001168622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3346224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0802068515556282,"score_gpt":0.2172516203180946,"score_spread":0.1370447687624664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}