{"id":"W2050847606","doi":"10.2166/wst.2012.065","title":"Variability in nitrogen content of submerged aquatic vegetation: utility as an indicator of N dynamics within and among lakes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Science & Technology","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Aquatic plant; Nutrient; Ecology; Environmental science; Proxy (statistics); Vegetation (pathology); Ecosystem; Aquatic ecosystem; Indicator value; Spatial variability; Biology; Macrophyte","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000327192,0.0001606522,0.0002643525,0.0007166216,0.0004073694,0.0004283234,0.0002297828,0.0001973114,0.0003171294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006322176,0.0001645153,0.0001320735,0.0006343098,0.0003130343,0.0004024396,0.0003667346,0.0001505938,0.00005018338],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003139703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001542516,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007672705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01857197,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997861,0.00005671034,0.00001417356,0.00009038921,0.00003442166,0.00001821725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994991,0.000137415,0.0001790377,0.00003878474,0.00009072066,0.00005494798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002721408,0.00003347544,0.9198829,0.00002927453,0.0001124137,0.00004925505,0.0004602432,0.0006437425,0.07183549,0.00005748173,0.0000436742,0.006579955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001931083,0.00003819482,0.9963303,0.000002085359,0.00001352983,0.00003580742,0.0001390813,0.001518775,0.001779092,0.00004883822,0.000087661,0.000004742534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994844,0.00003233797,0.0002006007,0.000003856717,4.847902e-7,0.000001536376,0.00007514594,0.000005724388,0.0001959035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994985,0.00001300092,0.0003340538,0.000003379031,8.762764e-7,0.000003154178,0.00007992906,0.000002194245,0.00006499841],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007672705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01525605,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01052640475924267,"score_gpt":0.2196023609328113,"score_spread":0.2090759561735686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}