{"id":"W2050959505","doi":"10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.10.008","title":"A coupled kinematics–energetics model for predicting energy efficient flapping flight","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","topic":"Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms","field":"Engineering","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research; Brown University","keywords":"Flapping; Kinematics; Wing; Budgerigar; Aerospace engineering; Thrust; Energetics; Aerodynamics; Amplitude; Bird flight; Acoustics; Physics; Computer science; Biology; Engineering; Classical mechanics; Optics; Zoology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008075322,0.0001632514,0.0003666004,0.0001271816,0.00005484516,0.00001296202,0.0002076909,0.0002233159,0.0000913273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000220608,0.0001134625,0.0001792123,0.00008710937,0.0001236278,0.00003324322,0.00004123545,0.0001751473,0.000003749387],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004001094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001707134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.393847e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.627119e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998713,0.00005149533,0.0006016344,0.00008075619,0.0001219277,0.0004311712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990886,0.0003159441,0.0001364922,0.000128422,0.0001213029,0.0002092385],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007101669,0.00006165024,0.00002815409,0.00005896917,0.00009023052,9.739542e-7,0.0002228174,0.03418312,0.1346507,0.8290458,0.0003192211,0.001267416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004299453,0.0001445343,0.000002038481,0.00003864318,0.00007587633,0.000040228,0.00002226862,0.887352,0.04882155,0.06246411,0.0004796335,0.0001291714],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1044105,0.0008181939,0.8924397,0.0002214566,0.001489787,0.00007556835,0.000007764931,0.0000395851,0.0004974598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9490342,0.00006635256,0.05019566,0.0001000118,0.0005453667,0.000006850065,0.000003725227,0.00002751579,0.00002034727],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8531689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4626865,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0120786277801757,"score_gpt":0.2368028594751058,"score_spread":0.2247242316949301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}