{"id":"W2050959505","doi":"10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.10.008","title":"A coupled kinematics–energetics model for predicting energy efficient flapping flight","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","topic":"Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms","field":"Engineering","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research; Brown University","keywords":"Flapping; Kinematics; Wing; Budgerigar; Aerospace engineering; Thrust; Energetics; Aerodynamics; Amplitude; Bird flight; Acoustics; Physics; Computer science; Biology; Engineering; Classical mechanics; Optics; Zoology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043734,0.0007166014,0.001128945,0.0007389695,0.0009576876,0.00102017,0.001349007,0.002076568,0.003087125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001683226,0.0009516698,0.0009965897,0.0005536284,0.0008814496,0.001058969,0.001079934,0.0009476033,0.0005276604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008870017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00116428,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01693564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007409211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998963,0.00002544047,0.000007113451,0.00002054766,0.00002609972,0.00002447063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995645,0.0002560859,0.00004216821,0.00002918972,0.0000583548,0.00004967123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008364358,0.000008658221,0.0001913786,0.000006287107,0.000008177114,0.00002516748,0.000006922832,0.9969789,0.0002703357,0.001751828,0.00005996977,0.0006839423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000377169,0.000003835794,0.0000651849,8.327153e-7,0.00000251836,0.00000300722,0.000001492765,0.9993281,0.00002251407,0.0005337844,0.00003300674,0.000001874633],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4204516,0.000988298,0.5479511,0.001032064,0.0002487586,0.0001342718,0.0004982836,0.0005876534,0.02810796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839091,0.0001971497,0.01137874,0.00008790991,0.00004226835,0.0001082455,0.000107828,0.00007890006,0.004089948],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01693564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03367412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0120786277801757,"score_gpt":0.2368028594751058,"score_spread":0.2247242316949301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}