{"id":"W2051025145","doi":"10.1139/x06-032","title":"Effectiveness of solitary retention trees for conserving epiphytes: differential short-term responses of bryophytes and lichens","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Lichen and fungal ecology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eesti Teadusfondi","keywords":"Lichen; Epiphyte; Fraxinus; Bark (sound); Biology; Biodiversity; Ecology; Betula pubescens; Botany; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001256973,0.00007614786,0.0002674019,0.000119483,0.0001582139,0.00002707133,0.0001957911,0.00009585532,0.00005678955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004116054,0.00003539461,0.0001128005,0.000187676,0.0003541539,0.00008788995,0.0000197271,0.0001549593,2.534653e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003750309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001732856,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0113438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2207418,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987244,0.0003608417,0.0003127089,0.0001173559,0.0001707416,0.0003139305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972743,0.001873793,0.0001018375,0.00004306404,0.0005145092,0.0001925029],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003790951,0.00002566915,0.8497157,0.0001078224,0.00002418554,0.00001251534,0.00003486791,0.000003591583,0.1469634,0.0005347017,0.00009600278,0.002102481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002304919,0.001207147,0.9865301,0.0001722929,0.00001383406,0.00002240742,0.0001246472,0.00002597243,0.008171506,0.003384427,0.00005885942,0.00005827826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984936,0.0007510323,0.000007402674,0.0001940676,0.00009528778,0.0002593001,0.0001027901,0.000001522177,0.00009501495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996803,0.00002714232,0.00004313514,0.000003224427,0.0001815376,0.000005730933,0.00001498052,0.000001175533,0.00004280688],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.209398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952397,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04936107114541528,"score_gpt":0.2946444716496342,"score_spread":0.2452834005042189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}