{"id":"W2051171531","doi":"10.1139/x05-074","title":"Comparison of coniferous forest carbon stocks between old-growth and young second-growth forests on two soil types in central British Columbia, Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Taiga; Forestry; Coarse woody debris; Old-growth forest; Forest floor; Snag; Temperate climate; Temperate rainforest; Environmental science; Carbon stock; Boreal; Soil water; Agronomy; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Ecosystem; Soil science; Climate change; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002352872,0.0003611195,0.0003044597,0.001904091,0.00137316,0.001103029,0.0006077732,0.0002044726,0.001506343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004611353,0.0002809809,0.0001947446,0.002407743,0.0005588503,0.0002281871,0.0004305977,0.0002108175,0.0001801717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01087569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005400521,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9852802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970456,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997383,0.00001094165,0.00001540647,0.00005404638,0.00007727611,0.000104143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990821,0.00005213986,0.00008308423,0.00002584561,0.0004615746,0.0002951029],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001573869,0.00003374596,0.9807313,0.00005700578,0.00007421948,0.0002208005,0.0008954714,0.0002584282,0.004620997,0.00008403155,0.0006823879,0.01218429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002772882,0.000004798074,0.9991205,0.000008503227,0.000006456317,0.00002016083,0.0003241135,0.00009591253,0.00009686947,0.000003653184,0.0003133857,0.000002905852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976337,0.000314969,0.00004193951,0.000017038,0.000002168414,0.000009389178,0.0009206943,0.000006143232,0.001054075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972909,0.0002074532,0.00011774,0.00001840455,8.982094e-7,0.000007510351,0.001067858,0.000003197859,0.001285882],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01471984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07890898,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03130142774679891,"score_gpt":0.2583370322250034,"score_spread":0.2270356044782045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}