{"id":"W2051221173","doi":"10.1002/(sici)1097-024x(200006)30:7<825::aid-spe322>3.0.co;2-1","title":"Software product lines: a case study","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Practice and Experience","topic":"Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Software product line; Software engineering; Exploit; Time to market; Abstraction; Product (mathematics); Domain (mathematical analysis); Java; Documentation; Domain analysis; Domain engineering; Software; New product development; Process (computing); Software development; Programming language; Software construction; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000688741,0.0003124498,0.0002925342,0.00009379554,0.0004102696,0.0002806734,0.000692817,0.00006496627,0.00003862382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008606893,0.0002864347,0.00004407779,0.0006561801,0.0001303457,0.003551968,0.0003191227,0.0003452006,0.00004963958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003834756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007423812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002207897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000990331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975383,0.0002880801,0.0003449015,0.000981503,0.0003649555,0.000482296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961885,0.002194394,0.0001136057,0.001143786,0.0001799733,0.0001797126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005331626,0.0004349754,0.002716991,0.00003749473,0.00004009824,0.009384003,0.07271874,0.002596482,0.00004801445,0.00009432639,0.0001417405,0.9117338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00895642,0.008175595,0.008786083,0.0005300633,0.0004958492,0.302314,0.2941254,0.004418791,0.006708307,0.01572813,0.3378424,0.01191895],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2879547,0.00108141,0.7087692,0.0002225863,0.0002839277,0.0003598891,0.000001283008,0.001294464,0.00003249045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2533427,0.000163214,0.74559,0.0003558775,0.00009822974,0.0001685157,6.050703e-7,0.00002281467,0.0002581173],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8998148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03995879755292413,"score_gpt":0.3447755813809009,"score_spread":0.3048167838279768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}