{"id":"W2051285135","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.3017","title":"Economic evaluations of occupational health interventions from a corporate perspective – a systematic review of methodological quality","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid","keywords":"Psychological intervention; EconLit; Generalizability theory; Population; Medicine; Actuarial science; MEDLINE; Economic evaluation; Psychology; Family medicine; Nursing; Environmental health; Political science; Business; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08455496,0.0005644766,0.01342621,0.0008307511,0.0002237471,0.00003305535,0.0008649615,0.0003513606,0.001607829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006029784,0.0005506632,0.002477009,0.0003492217,0.0002934835,0.0002769999,0.0001256909,0.001077397,0.0002909799],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005451668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002768174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006168214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006126586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9633991,0.009652578,0.02523007,0.0007365145,0.0004335997,0.0005481965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9158481,0.004093084,0.07832445,0.001044679,0.0001503664,0.0005393305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004262978,0.0005613886,0.001419357,0.9721358,0.001108397,0.000001071192,0.0009573225,0.00003776991,2.803585e-8,0.01628104,0.002933063,0.004522069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008820469,0.0008329288,0.004811877,0.9673302,0.0007525932,0.00004581439,0.0007319113,0.000009952228,7.459836e-8,0.008061914,0.01594858,0.0005921465],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008179876,0.9760006,0.009581005,0.006092001,0.0007770028,0.003836549,0.003573056,0.00000877095,0.00004918952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001926863,0.9822083,0.01551379,0.001188673,0.0002860446,0.0001847353,0.0002912371,0.00005973759,0.00007486872],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07852517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7487842754441955,"score_gpt":0.5836090939025249,"score_spread":0.1651751815416705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}