{"id":"W2051285135","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.3017","title":"Economic evaluations of occupational health interventions from a corporate perspective – a systematic review of methodological quality","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid","keywords":"Psychological intervention; EconLit; Generalizability theory; Population; Medicine; Actuarial science; MEDLINE; Economic evaluation; Psychology; Family medicine; Nursing; Environmental health; Political science; Business; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2850235,0.003103641,0.015892,0.03052993,0.002348531,0.01079092,0.0042755,0.005077558,0.003130799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5698701,0.002852626,0.01773356,0.02332815,0.004155738,0.007560181,0.00479837,0.003195014,0.0002986885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01410005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02930001,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003877884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008367897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5194911,0.261227,0.1602594,0.007397612,0.04982905,0.001795774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3749118,0.4735564,0.1030329,0.0107574,0.03650146,0.001240056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001054773,0.00007998661,0.004679606,0.895239,0.03884673,0.000126815,0.001007169,0.0005891257,0.0002670338,0.001614322,0.001433267,0.05506222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001361106,0.0006229942,0.008768705,0.8896953,0.08518486,0.0002891114,0.0008137453,0.001123986,0.0005917789,0.002507255,0.008921329,0.0001197012],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.009194637,0.9628173,0.008127946,0.003529887,0.0007200972,0.01324151,0.001118118,0.00004986638,0.001200657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2252342,0.6251267,0.0693083,0.00432712,0.001295428,0.07215258,0.001962367,0.00009401209,0.000499367],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7149765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8816934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7487842754441955,"score_gpt":0.5836090939025249,"score_spread":0.1651751815416705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}