{"id":"W2051290467","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2014-0249","title":"Shear behaviour of sandy silt treated with lignosulfonate","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department of Transport and Main Roads, Queensland Government; Australian Research Council","keywords":"Geotechnical engineering; Silt; Subgrade; Lime; Soil water; Triaxial shear test; Levee; Pore water pressure; Soil stabilization; Gypsum; Environmental science; Asphalt; Shear (geology); Geology; Materials science; Composite material; Soil science; Metallurgy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002512757,0.0001664076,0.000246191,0.0002284496,0.00007456446,0.0000344011,0.0002114641,0.0002069058,0.00006843948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009258687,0.0001435506,0.00007369983,0.0003149846,0.00006136283,0.00007530944,0.000008596694,0.0005126196,0.00001029449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001620119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008212995,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002067661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001054085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989386,0.00002428088,0.0003173372,0.0001244064,0.000197441,0.0003979146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989963,0.00004008261,0.0000390881,0.0002266461,0.00009828555,0.0005996138],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006017074,0.00001250574,0.0007208286,0.00002002953,0.0000223866,0.00002715307,0.00001523132,0.9918138,0.0006654691,0.0003765564,0.0006222483,0.005697752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001867855,0.0009447813,0.05967054,0.0004403504,0.0001665723,0.001002605,0.00004789414,0.8921432,0.004039543,0.0007351725,0.03782751,0.001113936],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8760084,0.000283632,0.1194074,0.0003676016,0.0002346053,0.0002408226,0.00003181606,0.0005944624,0.002831286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993502,0.0000360787,0.0004203412,0.00003476549,0.00007100576,0.000005114681,0.000006680715,0.00004278064,0.00003296828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1233419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5853825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005072889421986121,"score_gpt":0.1726622665736496,"score_spread":0.1675893771516635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}