{"id":"W2051385899","doi":"10.1289/ehp.01109s6885","title":"Societal costs of exposure to toxic substances: economic and health costs of four case studies that are candidates for environmental causation.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environmental Health Perspectives","topic":"Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental health; Jurisdiction; Economic impact analysis; Economic cost; Business; Medicine; Economics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007497495,0.000894533,0.0004946499,0.004561342,0.001147252,0.002083108,0.0007839301,0.001525265,0.004447928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03103267,0.000391529,0.002980867,0.005163761,0.001132478,0.001852207,0.002203991,0.001175718,0.0001967568],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008778681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003948369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03495864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07058153,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994194,0.003914544,0.0003755965,0.000204734,0.0008507112,0.0004604121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850718,0.01086744,0.001770534,0.0004847299,0.001553265,0.0002522043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001671837,0.0006721257,0.458932,0.007575836,0.005514832,0.01276017,0.00268324,0.02780514,0.0004608694,0.1422078,0.03492551,0.3047906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006147301,0.00196091,0.4687455,0.02206683,0.01959662,0.03554639,0.03693707,0.04573982,0.003336496,0.1630087,0.2018783,0.0005685589],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.6673142,0.1765132,0.02292425,0.04046239,0.001272804,0.002925921,0.0132439,0.00005648922,0.07528679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9168754,0.05939766,0.0144676,0.002255933,0.0002711841,0.001057389,0.001924287,0.00001654701,0.003734057],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03495864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06951028,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08155798322787344,"score_gpt":0.3741379818181465,"score_spread":0.2925799985902731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}