{"id":"W2051390697","doi":"10.2514/1.39580","title":"Finite Element Method Applied to Supersonic Flutter of Circular Cylindrical Shells","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AIAA Journal","topic":"Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Flutter; Aeroelasticity; Supersonic speed; Finite element method; Shell (structure); Aerodynamics; Structural engineering; Boundary value problem; Stiffness matrix; Mechanics; Physics; Engineering; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005410384,0.0005703736,0.0008131213,0.0005368436,0.0004603713,0.0004595669,0.0008925284,0.001133176,0.006080106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008701663,0.0004859999,0.0006752023,0.0004164091,0.0004493172,0.0004291584,0.0008181624,0.0006646126,0.001570639],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003461388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008850675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003067967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003584536,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997839,0.00007412945,0.00001171955,0.00002341788,0.0000886366,0.00001818177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997454,0.00012068,0.00002394547,0.00002498741,0.00007315751,0.00001176449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000950308,0.00007696474,0.0008282108,0.0002047139,0.00004278663,0.0002099416,0.0002069108,0.8559754,0.02582275,0.01648232,0.001904599,0.09815039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008218695,0.00002265766,0.00007882317,0.00001275273,0.000003646168,0.00003239799,0.00001234146,0.9944021,0.001372958,0.0007922066,0.003256592,0.000005417977],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009139104,0.0001340065,0.9848564,0.00005868603,0.00005481158,0.00008934745,0.00007214012,0.0004228395,0.005172645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2315401,0.0003597927,0.7517377,0.00008351832,0.00003399208,0.0007176164,0.0003101781,0.0003576487,0.0148595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006080106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02034003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005689186200213444,"score_gpt":0.2287121026106425,"score_spread":0.2230229164104291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}