{"id":"W2051390697","doi":"10.2514/1.39580","title":"Finite Element Method Applied to Supersonic Flutter of Circular Cylindrical Shells","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AIAA Journal","topic":"Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Flutter; Aeroelasticity; Supersonic speed; Finite element method; Shell (structure); Aerodynamics; Structural engineering; Boundary value problem; Stiffness matrix; Mechanics; Physics; Engineering; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017157,0.0001031015,0.0002011174,0.0001548793,0.00004235168,0.00003751536,0.0001190781,0.00004364247,0.0004255096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000570798,0.00009093042,0.0001144758,0.0002302508,0.000003688989,0.0000458389,0.000009668632,0.0001742856,0.00001364849],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005617059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009877465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.763526e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.325142e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992252,0.00002062172,0.0002919141,0.00009194072,0.0001954427,0.0001748902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999668,0.00002409574,0.00003442603,0.0001257778,0.00004595425,0.0001017428],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007805829,0.00001301856,0.00008045048,0.000005308473,0.00006794173,0.000005393146,0.0003568908,0.9145206,0.05219459,0.0001289621,0.0006779407,0.03194107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001494058,0.0003445857,0.01308284,0.00006831541,0.0004309716,0.0001334599,0.0001702881,0.8772249,0.08721484,0.001984736,0.01713932,0.0007116982],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0328819,0.0001834107,0.962732,0.0003812877,0.0001129195,0.0000769509,0.000001862003,0.00002534027,0.003604325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.944468,0.00004369731,0.05491187,0.0003786262,0.0001687478,7.672333e-7,0.000003807624,0.00001045219,0.00001407951],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.911586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4659032,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005689186200213444,"score_gpt":0.2287121026106425,"score_spread":0.2230229164104291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}