{"id":"W2051488347","doi":"10.7202/800326ar","title":"The Commission of Conservation as a Forerunner to the National Research Council 1909-1921","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientia Canadensis Canadian Journal of the History of Science Technology and Medicine","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Commission; Political science; Public administration; Environmentalism; Nature Conservation; Law; Politics; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006420181,0.00007576786,0.0001431097,0.0004900688,0.001372569,0.00000306292,0.00115993,0.00004790892,0.0001864209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001933831,0.00003592973,0.0000316258,0.001747872,0.06062207,0.0001013308,0.0001007112,0.000279919,0.00000404575],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004823783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00404851,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02419164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07714026,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967712,0.00006993405,0.0002958768,0.0001681397,0.002411955,0.0002828923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986324,0.00008656522,0.0002850557,0.0002354174,0.0004662997,0.0002942671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002448154,0.00001229075,0.001559887,0.000002197227,0.000005972899,0.000004756659,0.004418107,0.000158206,0.03271342,0.007167786,0.9489126,0.005020331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001397068,0.000313852,0.02425578,0.00006865307,0.00001194216,0.0001292445,0.003418187,0.00004539888,0.0002779323,0.004694349,0.9665963,0.00004866423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5345187,0.004474735,0.00002428853,0.3997827,0.00235642,0.0003703735,0.000004875533,0.000004904008,0.05846299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873321,0.00003573287,0.00006884856,0.00207222,0.00002918386,0.000001256206,6.12221e-8,0.000002508616,0.0104581],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4528134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999275,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04333142996044431,"score_gpt":0.2590524011043871,"score_spread":0.2157209711439428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}