{"id":"W2051541109","doi":"10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.12.020","title":"Validation and performance comparison of two carbon isotope ratio methods to control the misuse of androgens in humans","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Chromatography B","topic":"Hormonal and reproductive studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"World Anti-Doping Agency","keywords":"Chemistry; Isotope-ratio mass spectrometry; Chromatography; Mass spectrometry; Urine; Testosterone (patch); Extraction (chemistry); Fractionation; Solid phase extraction; Isotopes of carbon; Forensic toxicology; Environmental chemistry; Internal medicine; Biochemistry; Total organic carbon","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005946625,0.00008072005,0.0005104197,0.0002479512,0.00004726415,0.000002147112,0.00005406008,0.00002305732,0.0000025436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006896479,0.00004620503,0.000108278,0.0003225727,0.000177062,0.0000473428,0.00001300316,0.0001282825,7.110417e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008886188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003607069,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002745224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005847995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989779,0.0001066163,0.0005263269,0.00008024593,0.0002232819,0.00008562724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991425,0.00008570973,0.0003358382,0.0001096331,0.0002823472,0.00004394813],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003584651,0.0001651784,0.8620277,0.00007435001,0.0002085027,0.000004499416,0.004433937,0.00008226057,0.1312465,0.00002554415,0.00005005416,0.001323007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001943198,0.001041407,0.7965277,0.0001385735,0.0001374931,0.00009444915,0.0007648093,0.0001860315,0.1989805,0.0000375577,0.00009736029,0.00005081379],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953833,0.003410632,0.0002911121,0.000380214,0.00005446717,0.0002091656,0.000001260789,0.000002076547,0.0002678281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974363,0.0004779201,0.00197612,0.0000243547,0.00007155828,0.000002717779,2.515672e-7,0.000005025191,0.000005777908],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06773403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1884187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03775193028314053,"score_gpt":0.3611760024222299,"score_spread":0.3234240721390893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}