{"id":"W2051617963","doi":"10.1037/a0014320","title":"Are first- and second-language factors related in predicting second-language reading comprehension? A study of Spanish-speaking children acquiring English as a second language from first to second grade.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Educational Psychology","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reading comprehension; Reading (process); Comprehension; Linguistics; Second-language attrition; Language assessment; Comprehension approach; Second language; Language education; Mathematics education","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001421092,0.0004314067,0.0004016899,0.0008183327,0.0003271252,0.0009977706,0.0004148617,0.0006442969,0.001338758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00911551,0.0004195869,0.000542827,0.0006048714,0.0005571491,0.000747826,0.0005119843,0.0009752296,0.0004880136],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005685773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001011178,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02775023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04471128,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995601,0.0001294278,0.00003892934,0.00007473389,0.00009227655,0.0001045955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939808,0.002727399,0.001850403,0.000231112,0.0006075033,0.0006029145],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005808786,0.0002301465,0.9930022,0.0000176035,0.00003290294,0.0001155324,0.003156177,0.00003806085,0.0004144791,0.00002341035,0.00006350269,0.002847805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041818,0.0001597853,0.9974728,0.000007628093,0.00001083689,0.00009289951,0.00191463,0.0001067916,0.00009645274,0.0000260634,0.000105006,0.000002905612],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997218,0.00007989486,0.00001751232,0.00001902771,0.000001234073,0.000002779728,0.00003387042,0.000001478895,0.0001224442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992679,0.0001170182,0.00008801786,0.0000168972,0.000001524932,0.00001295481,0.0001699082,0.000002550544,0.0003233129],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02775023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05517739,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01694707980633333,"score_gpt":0.3354134138937691,"score_spread":0.3184663340874357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}