{"id":"W2051629491","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17078.x","title":"The utility of covariances: a response to Ranta et al","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oikos","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université de Montréal; University of Guelph; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Covariance; Interspecific competition; Population; Competition (biology); Law of total covariance; Range (aeronautics); Econometrics; Mathematics; Covariance intersection; Covariance function; Statistics; Ecology; Biology; Demography; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004386917,0.00004408948,0.00006890247,0.000004240555,0.0002441576,0.000001863036,0.0001267575,0.00001840789,0.001001874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001083493,0.00002818557,0.00002482841,0.00007719309,0.0003650321,0.00003243458,0.000124732,0.00005246358,0.0002830481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000146477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009530194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001121677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003360419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994944,0.00009303512,0.00008601297,0.0001108099,0.0001025174,0.0001131628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999655,0.0001608807,0.00002423889,0.0001297877,0.000004012588,0.00002604817],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002850725,0.0001795211,0.7736815,0.000001275149,0.00001393554,0.00003864926,0.00243529,0.00001010802,0.0279426,0.0001227453,0.1891227,0.003600901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001056029,0.00009607179,0.8767955,0.000001219819,0.000002697152,0.000006353152,0.00007938347,0.00001218064,0.0007532692,0.00002721674,0.1220876,0.00003289934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861664,0.00002169643,0.00005097895,0.004650012,0.00004811938,0.00009014932,0.000005088503,0.000008715975,0.008958839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968237,0.0000347224,0.0002099951,0.001520909,0.000002073466,0.00001336287,1.589048e-7,0.000001992809,0.001393069],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.103114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03385522214684843,"score_gpt":0.2920157115130437,"score_spread":0.2581604893661953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}