{"id":"W2051648971","doi":"10.4153/cmb-2011-132-4","title":"On Constructing Ergodic Hyperfinite Equivalence Relations of Non-Product Type","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Mathematical Bulletin","topic":"Advanced Operator Algebra Research","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Mathematics; Equivalence relation; Equivalence (formal languages); Ergodic theory; Matrix equivalence; Logical equivalence; Pure mathematics; Product (mathematics); Quotient algebra; Type (biology); Algebra over a field; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005453956,0.0002029539,0.0003640304,0.00024796,0.0001375774,0.00001733921,0.0003708709,0.0001058578,0.02332641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006459391,0.0001872745,0.00007467136,0.000386497,0.0003247979,0.0000449546,0.00005929629,0.0003931295,0.007447779],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001950721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004596957,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002448519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001984955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981902,0.00008244583,0.000501977,0.0003362877,0.0003442649,0.0005448356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974741,0.0009763107,0.0001154004,0.0006830739,0.0002591992,0.0004918695],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003434296,0.0001158893,0.0002573114,0.0002862918,0.00004397965,0.00006920721,0.001041392,0.000005311398,0.0007424855,0.9899802,0.006539371,0.0008841795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000702051,0.0003513689,0.0002168543,0.0006697096,0.00006726084,0.0001028887,0.0008163592,0.0003914996,0.009630072,0.9842033,0.002268248,0.0005803508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8095004,0.00005077727,0.003573753,0.0005498026,0.0001477631,0.0006639592,0.00003389694,0.00007333577,0.1854063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9178666,0.000003705035,0.07968307,0.000115631,0.00004084111,0.00002148131,0.000002591874,0.00005372708,0.002212342],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.183194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08268371816599808,"score_gpt":0.3150263731013518,"score_spread":0.2323426549353537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}