{"id":"W2051678914","doi":"10.1142/s1793431112500236","title":"A STRONG MOTION MODEL OF THE 2004 GREAT SUMATRA EARTHQUAKE: SIMULATION USING A MODIFIED SEMI EMPIRICAL METHOD","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami","topic":"earthquake and tectonic studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee; McMaster University","keywords":"Seismology; Geology; Magnitude (astronomy); Strong ground motion; Earthquake simulation; Earthquake rupture; Ground motion; Moment magnitude scale; Interplate earthquake; Geodesy; Peak ground acceleration; Fault (geology); Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001066369,0.0001970061,0.0004139736,0.0001422674,0.0002462534,0.00004045809,0.0001505829,0.0001217895,0.0001822914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001363393,0.0001261456,0.0002317989,0.0002642827,0.0001171164,0.0005628171,0.00002487943,0.0003210714,0.000004622885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007197024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009048235,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001669487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002226719,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981143,0.0002431929,0.000613754,0.0001493486,0.000499955,0.0003794787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986065,0.0003534491,0.0005119586,0.0001891399,0.0001663122,0.0001726438],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007528246,0.00003806361,0.3400103,0.00002348365,0.00008251178,0.000001929919,0.000871637,0.6115413,0.00009010665,0.00005722642,0.00002556001,0.0471826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004987057,0.0001038839,0.5397949,0.00005696916,0.0001126762,0.00007116378,0.0002044265,0.458408,0.0001181654,0.000419914,0.00009293552,0.0001182789],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.972174,0.002433539,0.02404261,0.0001312329,0.0002698627,0.0001390991,0.00002779676,0.000007240704,0.0007746398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963738,0.00008839399,0.003172598,0.00008008561,0.000208118,2.147632e-7,0.000002103012,0.000006840558,0.00006782309],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1997845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5144069,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08605104489501414,"score_gpt":0.3181608640860936,"score_spread":0.2321098191910794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}