{"id":"W2051682715","doi":"10.1115/pvp2014-28049","title":"Closed-Form Stress Intensity Factor Solutions for Circumferential Through-Wall Cracks in Cylinder","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Volume 1: Codes and Standards","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Kinectrics (Canada)","funders":"U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission","keywords":"Cylinder; Stress intensity factor; Bending; Structural engineering; Tension (geology); Materials science; Fracture mechanics; Cracking; Finite element method; Stress (linguistics); Fracture (geology); Mechanics; Engineering; Composite material; Compression (physics); Mechanical engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002718546,0.0001736005,0.0002740481,0.00005496709,0.0001345216,0.00006780715,0.00008914429,0.000152951,0.00006019487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008463116,0.0001630656,0.00007110879,0.0000720293,0.00003605445,0.0001477268,0.00003605458,0.0001980495,0.000002104234],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001241516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003656893,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001195366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001700867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989613,0.00001394321,0.00021633,0.000191101,0.0002334967,0.0003838328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995041,0.00004339828,0.00002736147,0.0001709933,0.0001864103,0.00006773773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00163335,0.0009343113,0.04321631,0.0047752,0.001523821,0.00004128545,0.03835201,0.03986407,0.01219658,0.07365112,0.129878,0.6539339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002362276,0.0003263606,0.01574794,0.0001673098,0.00007134114,0.000004717414,0.00047722,0.7730017,0.002394231,0.01146077,0.1932091,0.0007770287],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2979582,0.000381904,0.6981332,0.0001540637,0.0007136704,0.0002805492,0.001311687,0.0001461931,0.000920555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988548,0.0001299908,0.0006617953,0.00006981436,0.0001294131,0.00001646613,0.00005039301,0.00002788448,0.00005946289],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7331377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6649624,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01860176310044918,"score_gpt":0.2454790941122227,"score_spread":0.2268773310117735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}