{"id":"W2051705937","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2002.tb00426.x","title":"Can Normality of Yields Be Assumed for Crop Insurance?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normality; Heteroscedasticity; Agricultural science; Crop insurance; Yield (engineering); Mathematics; Normality test; Welfare economics; Economics; Econometrics; Statistics; Agriculture; Geography; Environmental science; Physics; Statistical hypothesis testing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05340299,0.0008984345,0.00210329,0.001241333,0.0008337449,0.003524053,0.002906029,0.002242056,0.004444737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3033759,0.0007880571,0.002918095,0.001767922,0.0077868,0.008701701,0.002056461,0.003846178,0.001554648],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002645845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002742624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008940607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004458039,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9647036,0.01451186,0.002187969,0.01002908,0.006235452,0.002331928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7610322,0.1687635,0.02383338,0.03450509,0.01028176,0.001584034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002174547,0.0003530801,0.4682705,0.0006961474,0.001391934,0.002533193,0.006409373,0.06428526,0.003897045,0.2670141,0.01114083,0.171834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002876208,0.001087955,0.270301,0.0004392391,0.0003824767,0.001898247,0.003776469,0.2418071,0.005008388,0.4620047,0.01272726,0.0002795856],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4493639,0.001750555,0.5160578,0.009760372,0.0008807951,0.0004141409,0.001696453,0.001036035,0.01904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981765,0.0005126376,0.0139552,0.0007584231,0.0002693636,0.000174418,0.0008024402,0.000161317,0.001601178],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05340299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2824254,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03607790946373123,"score_gpt":0.1692439343941824,"score_spread":0.1331660249304512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}